Theoretical basis: inflation bias
Kydland and Prescott (1977) argued that time inconsistency prevents discretionary policy from achieving optimal outcomes. Barro and Gordon (1983) showed that if a government is tempted to create surprise inflation to cut unemployment, people anticipate it, so unemployment does not fall and only prices rise, an inflation bias. The problem is a classic case of credible commitment.
The solution: a conservative central banker
Rogoff (1985) showed that delegating monetary policy to a conservative central banker who dislikes inflation more than society does reduces inflation bias, at the cost of a less flexible response to economic shocks. Cukierman (1992) synthesized the theory and evidence on credibility, strategy and independence. Independence is also understood as a safeguard against pre-election political business cycles.
Measurement and evidence
Cukierman, Webb and Neyapti (1992) built a legal independence index from statutory provisions such as governor tenure, policy authority, objectives and limits on lending to government, reporting that legal independence is linked to lower inflation in advanced economies, while actual independence, such as governor turnover, matters more in developing countries. Alesina and Summers (1993) found that in advanced economies greater independence brings lower inflation with no loss in growth. Garriga (2016) documented a large worldwide rise in independence since 1970.
FAQ
- Why is central bank independence needed?
- Politicians are tempted to pump money into the economy before elections, which tends only to raise prices, so monetary policy is given to a body insulated from politics to make price-stability promises credible.
- How is independence measured?
- Researchers use legal indices that score statutory provisions such as governor tenure, policy authority and limits on lending to government, along with actual indicators such as governor turnover.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85(3), 473–491. Time inconsistency.
- Barro, R. J., & Gordon, D. B. (1983). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(1), 101–121. Inflation bias.
- Rogoff, K. (1985). The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(4), 1169–1189. The conservative central banker.
- Cukierman, A., Webb, S. B., & Neyapti, B. (1992). Measuring the independence of central banks and its effect on policy outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review, 6(3), 353–398. Measuring independence.
- Alesina, A., & Summers, L. H. (1993). Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: Some comparative evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 25(2), 151–162. Comparative evidence.
- Cukierman, A. (1992). Central bank strategy, credibility, and independence: Theory and evidence. MIT Press. Theory and evidence.
- Garriga, A. C. (2016). Central bank independence in the world: A new data set. International Interactions, 42(5), 849–868. A global data set.
