CampusDownWiki CampusDown (Korean) ↗
English

The Rule of Law

⚖️ Law By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated Views 3
The rule of law means people with power are under the law too. It sounds like "ruling by law," but it's completely different. Dictators rule by law all the time. The real question is whether the people who make the law are bound by it too. From an English king's seal 800 years ago to an American President's resignation, here are the moments this idea actually stopped power in its tracks.
Contents
  1. 1. Background: even the king is under the law
  2. 2. Theory: what does "rule of law" actually mean?
  3. 3. The ruling: the Nixon tapes
  4. 4. In Korea: lawful administration
  5. 5. Criticism and debate
  6. 6. Study notes
  7. 7. References and official sources
Advertisement

Background: even the king is under the law

  1. 1215 King John, cornered by his barons, seals Magna Carta: no free man shall be seized or imprisoned "except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land."
  2. 1780 The Massachusetts Constitution, drafted by John Adams: "a government of laws and not of men."
  3. 1803 Chief Justice Marshall quotes that line in Marbury v. Madison.

The National Archives has a nice Magna Carta feature.

Theory: what does "rule of law" actually mean?

British constitutional scholar A. V. Dicey (1885) boiled it down to three ideas:

  • Nobody is punished except for a clear breach of established law (no arbitrary power)
  • Officials and ordinary people answer to the same law in the same courts
  • Rights are actually protected through court decisions

American legal philosopher Lon Fuller went further in The Morality of Law (1964). He listed eight things a legal system has to get right to count as law at all.

Fuller's eight principlesGenerality · publication · no retroactivity · clarity · no contradictions · possible to obey · stability over time · officials actually following the declared rules

The theory's tidy. The real test comes when power tries to stand above the law, and someone has to make that call. That job has always fallen to courts and lawyers. In 1974, a sitting President argued that his private conversations were off-limits even to the courts.

Advertisement

The ruling: the Nixon tapes

📁 Case file
Citation
United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974)
Vote
8–0 (Rehnquist recused), opinion by Chief Justice Warren Burger
Issue
Could the President use "executive privilege" to refuse a subpoena for White House tapes in the Watergate prosecution?
Holding
A generalized claim of privilege can't override a specific need for evidence in a criminal trial

Sixteen days later, on August 9, 1974, Nixon resigned. Full opinion on Justia.

In Korea: lawful administration

Korea's Constitution never actually uses the phrase "rule of law," but the Constitutional Court treats it as a foundational principle. Then in 2021, Article 8 of the Framework Act on Administration wrote the "principle of lawful administration" into statute.

ConceptMeaningExample
Supremacy of statuteAdministration can't violate statutesA ministry rule that contradicts a statute is void
Statutory reservationRestricting people's rights needs a statutory basisA business suspension with no statutory basis is unlawful

Germany's idea of the Rechtsstaat shaped Korean administrative law a lot. Rough difference: the Anglo-American rule of law is court-centered; the Rechtsstaat is statute-centered.

Criticism and debate

  • Thin vs. thick: if a terrible law follows all the right procedures, is that still rule of law? That's the heart of the famous Hart–Fuller debate.
  • Sliding into rule BY law: authoritarian governments can chant "rule of law" while passing laws that punish their critics.
  • Leaning on judges: if judges get the final word, who checks the judges?

The rule of law starts by refusing to trust "good" power. Weirdly, that's what makes it reassuring. Once this sinks in, you'll notice that a huge chunk of administrative law boils down to one question: "where's the legal basis?" Here's how to use that.

Advertisement

Study notes

Think about it. If a law is procedurally perfect but obviously unjust, is following it still "rule of law"?

References and official sources

  1. Magna Carta (1215). National Archives
  2. Massachusetts Constitution, Part the First, Art. XXX (1780).
  3. A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1885).
  4. Lon L. Fuller, The Morality of Law (1964).
  5. United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). Justia
  6. Framework Act on Administration, Art. 8 (Korea). law.go.kr

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

Find more reports · Search '법치주의' on CampusDown →

You may also like

This article was last updated on October 10, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.

Advertisement