Definition
SWOT analysis is a situation analysis tool that shows at a glance how well an organization's resources and capabilities (internal) fit changes in the market and society (external). It structures into a four-cell table the idea that strategy ultimately means “using what you do well to seize the opportunities the environment offers, while preparing for weaknesses and threats.”
It is widely used not only in strategic management and marketing courses but also in business plans for public agencies, hospitals, schools and social welfare organizations, startup plans and self-analysis for job hunting. It is one of the analytical frameworks most often used in university reports.
Key Concepts
Internal and external factors
- Strengths (S): internal resources and capabilities in which the organization outperforms competitors (e.g., brand awareness, technology, distribution network).
- Weaknesses (W): internal factors in which it lags behind competitors (e.g., high costs, staff shortages, weak online capabilities).
- Opportunities (O): external changes favorable to the organization (e.g., market growth, deregulation, the spread of new technology).
- Threats (T): external changes unfavorable to the organization (e.g., intensifying competition, recession, the emergence of substitutes).
The key is controllability. What the organization can change directly is classified as internal (S, W); what it cannot change and must respond to is classified as external (O, T). “Rising spending by younger consumers” is an opportunity, not a strength.
The perspective of fit
The Harvard business policy school held that good strategy emerges where an organization's distinctive competences meet the opportunities in its environment. SWOT is a starting point for finding this “fit,” not a strategy in itself.
Stages and Components
Step 1: External environment analysis
The macro environment is organized with PEST analysis, which looks at political, economic, social and technological factors, and the industry environment with Porter's Five Forces. Porter (1979, 1980) identified five forces that determine industry profitability: (1) rivalry among existing competitors, (2) the threat of new entrants, (3) the threat of substitutes, (4) the bargaining power of buyers and (5) the bargaining power of suppliers.
Step 2: Internal capability analysis
Strengths and weaknesses are identified by comparing finances, human resources, technology, brand, organizational culture and so on with competitors. Value chain analysis or the resource-based view (VRIO) are sometimes used alongside.
Step 3: Deriving strategies with the TOWS matrix
| Opportunities (O) | Threats (T) | |
|---|---|---|
| Strengths (S) | SO strategies: aggressive strategies that use strengths to exploit opportunities | ST strategies: diversification strategies that use strengths to avoid or reduce threats |
| Weaknesses (W) | WO strategies: turnaround strategies that use opportunities to overcome weaknesses | WT strategies: defensive strategies that minimize weaknesses and threats |
Weihrich (1982) proposed this matrix to address the problem that SWOT lists often fail to lead to actual strategies.
Theorists and Background
The origin of SWOT is unclear. The account that Albert Humphrey of the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) created it in the 1960s is widespread, but documentary evidence for it is weak. Puyt, Lie and Wilderom (2023) concluded that analysis matching internal capabilities to the external environment was systematized in Harvard Business School's business policy courses of the 1950s and 1960s and in the textbook Business Policy: Text and Cases (1965) by Learned, Christensen, Andrews and Guth. Kenneth Andrews developed this framework into the basic logic of strategy formulation in The Concept of Corporate Strategy (1971).
In the 1980s Michael Porter refined the analysis of external industry structure based on industrial organization economics, and in the 1990s the resource-based view, which emphasizes internal resources, emerged, deepening each of the two axes of SWOT.
Cash Note
청년문화예술패스 하반기 추가 발급 — 2006·2007년생 최대 20만 원, 11월 30일까지
3 readers so far
Make Korean friends & friends from around the world learning Korean
Chat easily with people from many countries who love Korea.
Beauty UP
대학생 가성비 기초 루틴 — 꼭 필요한 3단계만 남기기
Psych UP
나의 돈 성향 테스트｜저축 다람쥐? 오늘만 사는 플렉서?
Criticisms and Limitations
- Lists that do not lead to strategy: After reviewing SWOT cases from a number of companies, Hill and Westbrook (1997) criticized them as long, general lists without prioritization or verification that were hardly used in subsequent strategy formulation, going so far as to call for a “product recall.”
- Subjectivity and ambiguous classification: The same factor can be a strength or a weakness depending on perspective (e.g., large organizational size), and SWOTs are easily written without supporting data.
- Static analysis: As a snapshot of a particular moment, it struggles to reflect a rapidly changing environment and competitors' responses.
- Cognitive bias: Authors may interpret their own organization favorably or use the analysis to justify a conclusion already reached. This connects with the self-justification described by cognitive dissonance theory.
Applying It in a Report
Company case analysis
For “SWOT analysis and strategy proposals for Company X,” a good order is (1) company overview, (2) the external environment through PEST and the Five Forces, (3) internal capabilities based on evidence such as financial statements and market share, (4) the SWOT table, (5) TOWS strategies and (6) priorities and implementation plans. Attaching sourced evidence to each item and describing strengths relative to competitors makes a real difference in grading. When dealing with employee motivation and HR strategy, you can add Maslow's hierarchy of needs as support.
The CampusDown library (in Korean) also has reports that apply this theory in practice, such as 「써브웨이 마케팅 전략 조사: PEST, 5 forces, SWOT, KANO 분석과 STP, 7P 전략」, 「한진택배 마케팅 전략 분석: 택배산업 환경분석, SWOT·5-FORCE, 4P와 E-비즈니스 전략」. They show how the theory can be connected to real cases. For more, try the 'SWOT' report search.
Social welfare organizations and public program plans
In a program plan for a community children's center or welfare center, organize the organization's staff and programs (internal) and changes in the local population, policy and funding environment (external) with SWOT, and then set program priorities. Using it together with ecological systems theory, which analyzes the environmental systems surrounding clients, strengthens the basis of the macro-environment analysis.
Personal SWOT and job preparation
In cover letters or career planning assignments, you can organize your own competencies and changes in the job market with SWOT. Assignments about a period of struggling to choose a career can be interpreted with Erikson's identity vs. role confusion to deepen the self-analysis, and strategies for building confidence through successful experiences become more persuasive when linked to Bandura's concept of self-efficacy.
References
- Learned, E. P., Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. R., & Guth, W. D. (1965). Business Policy: Text and Cases. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
- Andrews, K. R. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
- Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 54–66.
- Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137–145.
- Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
- Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: It's time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46–52.
- Puyt, R. W., Lie, F. B., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2023). The origins of SWOT analysis. Long Range Planning, 56(3), 102304.