Definition
Cognitive dissonance theory explains that when two or more of a person's cognitions (thoughts, knowledge, beliefs, awareness of one's own behavior) are inconsistent, an unpleasant state of tension arises, and people are motivated to reduce that tension. When the cognitions “I know smoking is harmful” and “I smoke” clash, a smoker tries to reduce the dissonance by quitting or by adding a new reason such as “it helps me relieve stress.”
The key insight of the theory is that it overturned the common-sense idea that attitudes determine behavior, showing that behavior can change attitudes. When an action cannot be undone, people adjust their thinking to fit what they have done.
Key Concepts
Consonance, dissonance and irrelevance
Festinger classified the relationship between two cognitions as consonance (they support each other), dissonance (they contradict each other) or irrelevance (they are unrelated). Dissonance is treated as a motivational state that demands resolution, much like hunger.
Magnitude of dissonance
The magnitude of dissonance grows with the importance of the conflicting cognitions and with the number of dissonant cognitions relative to consonant ones. The more an issue concerns self-esteem or core values, the greater the dissonance.
Insufficient justification
The smaller the external reward or pressure for a behavior, the more people must find the reason for it within themselves, so attitude change is greater. This contrasts with the prediction of reinforcement theory that larger rewards strengthen behavior, which is why the two are often compared in reports.
Stages and Components
Four ways to reduce dissonance
- Change the behavior: stop the behavior causing the contradiction (e.g., quit smoking).
- Change a cognition: revise the conflicting belief (e.g., “it isn't that harmful”).
- Add new cognitions: add reasons that justify the behavior (e.g., “I exercise, so it's fine”).
- Reduce importance: treat the issue itself as trivial.
Classic research paradigms
- Forced compliance (the $1 experiment): Festinger and Carlsmith (1959) asked participants who had finished a boring task to tell the next participant that it was enjoyable, paying them either $1 or $20. Later, the $1 group rated the task as more enjoyable; the interpretation is that they lacked sufficient external justification for lying and therefore changed their attitude.
- Post-decision dissonance: Brehm (1956) reported that after choosing one of two similarly attractive items, people tended to rate the chosen item more favorably and the rejected one less favorably.
- Effort justification: Aronson and Mills (1959) found that participants who went through a more severe initiation rated the group more favorably.
Theorists and Background
Festinger (1919–1989) was a social psychologist influenced by Kurt Lewin. In the early 1950s he and his colleagues observed a small group that believed a doomsday prophecy and published When Prophecy Fails (1956). When nothing happened on the predicted day, some members, rather than abandoning their belief, interpreted it as “the world was saved thanks to our faith” and began proselytizing even more actively. This observation became an important background for the 1957 formulation of the theory.
Cognitive dissonance subsequently became one of the most researched topics in social psychology and was extended to studies of attitude change, persuasion, consumer behavior and health behavior. Because it involves distorting an uncomfortable reality, it is sometimes compared with rationalization among the defense mechanisms of psychoanalysis, but dissonance theory differs in explaining the phenomenon through a conscious drive for cognitive consistency rather than the unconscious, and in testing it experimentally.
Cash Note
청년문화예술패스 하반기 추가 발급 — 2006·2007년생 최대 20만 원, 11월 30일까지
3 readers so far
Make Korean friends & friends from around the world learning Korean
Chat easily with people from many countries who love Korea.
Beauty UP
대학생 가성비 기초 루틴 — 꼭 필요한 3단계만 남기기
Psych UP
나의 돈 성향 테스트｜저축 다람쥐? 오늘만 사는 플렉서?
Criticisms and Limitations
- Self-perception theory as an alternative: Bem (1967) argued that people do not change because of discomfort but simply “infer” their attitudes by observing their own behavior. Later research tends to conclude that self-perception fits better when attitudes are vague, and dissonance fits better when behavior conflicts with clear attitudes.
- The role of the self-concept: Aronson (1969) and others revised the theory, arguing that dissonance is especially strong when the self-concept of being a decent, consistent person is threatened, rather than with mere logical inconsistency.
- Measurement difficulties: The inner state of dissonance is hard to measure directly, and researchers may interpret experimental results differently.
- Cultural differences: Cross-cultural studies show that effects such as post-decision dissonance appear differently depending on self-construal and culture.
Applying It in a Report
Social psychology and attitude change
For a topic such as “Does behavior change attitudes?”, a sound structure is to summarize the procedure and results of the $1 experiment, compare it with Bem's self-perception theory, and close with everyday examples (such as attitudes toward volunteering changing after volunteering). Covering the process of learning attitudes and behavior by observing models together with Bandura's social learning theory broadens the explanation.
The CampusDown library (in Korean) also has reports that apply this theory in practice, such as 「소비자 만족 발표자료: 기대 불일치 이론과 공정성 이론, 서비스 복구, 브랜드와 서비스 애호도, 인지부조화」. They show how the theory can be connected to real cases. For more, try the '인지부조화' report search.
Consumer behavior and marketing
The anxiety of wondering “Did I make the right choice?” after buying something expensive is called post-purchase dissonance. The theory explains why companies reassure customers with thank-you messages, user guides and review events after a purchase. In a company case report, you can connect it by identifying “post-purchase dissatisfaction” as a weakness or threat in a SWOT analysis and proposing improvement strategies.
Motivation and self-esteem
The desire for recognition and the protection of the self-concept can be linked to Maslow's esteem needs. Using the example of students who rationalize failure in their study habits and proposing ways to help them resolve dissonance through behavior change gives the report a practical conclusion.
References
- Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210.
- Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When Prophecy Fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384–389.
- Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(2), 177–181.
- Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–34.
- Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183–200.