CampusDownWiki
Total citations 7,050한국어KO 2,631EnglishEN 2,503日本語JA 655中文ZH 1,261
CampusDown ↗
English

Self-perception theory

🧠 Psychology By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Self-perception theory says that when our attitudes or feelings are unclear, we infer them by observing our own behavior and its circumstances, much as an outside observer would. Social psychologist Daryl Bem proposed it in the late 1960s and laid it out fully in 1972.
Contents
  1. 1. What is self-perception theory?
  2. 2. The core claim
  3. 3. Self-perception vs cognitive dissonance
  4. 4. The overjustification effect
  5. 5. Practical uses
  6. 6. Frequently asked questions
  7. 7. References

What is self-perception theory?

Self-perception theory proposes that when internal cues about our attitudes or feelings are weak or ambiguous, we infer them by observing our own behavior and the circumstances in which it occurs, much as an outside observer would. Social psychologist Daryl Bem proposed it in the late 1960s and set it out fully in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology in 1972.

📌 At a glance
Meaning
We infer our attitudes from our own behavior
Proposed by
Daryl Bem (1967; 1972)
When it applies
When internal cues are weak or ambiguous
Related effects
Overjustification effect, foot-in-the-door

The core claim

If you cannot immediately say whether you like coffee, you might think, "I buy one every morning, so I must like it." Bem argued that we judge ourselves the same way we judge others: from what we do.

Self-perception vs cognitive dissonance

AspectCognitive dissonance theorySelf-perception theory
ExplanationInconsistency causes discomfort, so we change attitudesWe infer attitudes from behavior without discomfort
Core processReducing psychological tensionSelf-observation and inference
Best fitClear attitudes, large inconsistenciesVague or weak attitudes

Bem argued that Festinger’s famous "$1 vs $20" study could be explained by self-perception alone, without discomfort. Many researchers now see each theory as fitting different conditions.

The overjustification effect

Why can rewarding something people already enjoy make them enjoy it less? In a study by Lepper, Greene and Nisbett (1973), preschoolers who already liked drawing and were promised a reward for drawing later spent less free time drawing. From a self-perception view, the children interpreted their behavior as "I drew for the reward," which weakened their intrinsic interest.

Practical uses

  • Start small: agreeing to a small request can lead people to see themselves as helpful, making larger requests easier (foot-in-the-door).
  • Build habits: even ten minutes of study a day builds a self-image as "someone who studies."
  • Use rewards carefully: avoid piling contingent rewards on activities people already enjoy.

See also the fundamental attribution error and self-handicapping.

Frequently asked questions

What is self-perception theory?
Daryl Bem’s theory that when attitudes are unclear, we infer them from our own behavior and its circumstances.
How does it differ from cognitive dissonance?
Dissonance theory says discomfort drives attitude change; self-perception theory says we simply infer attitudes by observing behavior.
What is the overjustification effect?
The drop in intrinsic interest that can follow when an external reward is given for an already enjoyable activity.

References

  1. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Academic Press.
  2. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '자기지각이론' on CampusDown →
Fundamental attribution errorWhat is the fundamental attribution error? Lee Ross’s 1977 term, Jones and Harris’s 1967 Castro essay experiment, the related correspondence bias, everyday examples, the actor–observer bias, cultural differences, explanations from Gilbert and Malone, and ways to reduce it.🧠 PsychologySelf-handicappingWhat is self-handicapping? Why people create obstacles to their own success, how attribution theory explains it, the classic Berglas & Jones (1978) drug-choice experiment, behavioral vs. claimed self-handicaps, the costs for students and workers, and practical ways to break the habit.🧠 PsychologySelf-EfficacyBandura's self-efficacy: efficacy versus outcome expectations, the four sources (mastery, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, physiological states), level, strength and generality, measurement, and uses in learning, health behaviour and counselling.🧠 PsychologySocial exchange theoryWhat is social exchange theory? Contributions of Homans (1958), Thibaut and Kelley (1959) and Blau (1964), rewards and costs, comparison level and comparison level for alternatives, reciprocity, power, applications and criticisms.🧠 PsychologyIdentity status theoryWhat is identity status theory? How James Marcia (1966) turned Erikson’s ideas into research, the criteria of exploration and commitment, identity achievement, moratorium, foreclosure and diffusion, links to career choices, and limitations.🧠 PsychologyHerzberg’s two-factor theoryWhat is Herzberg’s two-factor (motivation-hygiene) theory? The 1959 Pittsburgh study, motivators such as achievement and recognition, hygiene factors such as pay and working conditions, job enrichment, comparison with Maslow, and criticisms.💼 Business

You may also like

More on CampusDown (Korean)

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 23, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.