CampusDownWiki
Total citations 20,378한국어KO 2,709EnglishEN 15,268日本語JA 799中文ZH 1,602
CampusDown ↗
English

Pull to Dismiss

⚙️ Engineering & Technology By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated Views 1
Pull to dismiss is a gesture where users drag an overlaid sheet or photo downward to close it.
Contents
  1. 1. When to use it
  2. 2. Thresholds and conflicts
  3. 3. Preventing accidents
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

When to use it

Overlays like bottom sheets feel natural to push away (Wobbrock et al., 2009). A grabber signals it (Norman, 1999; Material Design, n.d.). Photos shrink as you drag.

Thresholds and conflicts

Snap back under ~25–30% height unless flung. Gestures are less accurate on the move (Bragdon et al., 2011). Start dismissal only when inner lists are at top, and avoid clashing with predictive back (Android Developers, n.d.) and gesture navigation.

Preventing accidents

Block dismissal with unsaved input and show a confirmation dialog (Apple, n.d.). Provide a visible close button per WCAG 2.2 (W3C, 2023) 2.5.1/2.5.7.

FAQ

How far should users drag?
About a quarter of the height or a fast fling.
Do I still need a close button?
Yes, for users who can't or don't know the gesture.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-27

References

  1. Apple. (n.d.). Sheets. Human Interface Guidelines. Swipe-down sheet dismissal.
  2. Material Design. (n.d.). Bottom sheets. Drag handle and dismissal.
  3. Android Developers. (n.d.). Add support for the predictive back gesture. Predictive back previews.
  4. Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., & Wilson, A. D. (2009). User-defined gestures for surface computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1083–1092). ACM. User-defined gestures.
  5. Bragdon, A., Nelson, E., Li, Y., & Hinckley, K. (2011). Experimental analysis of touch-screen gesture designs in mobile environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 403–412). ACM. Gesture accuracy on the move.
  6. Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. Visible affordance.
  7. World Wide Web Consortium. (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. Criteria 2.5.1 and 2.5.7.

Found this helpful? Share it

Send it to a friend who needs it.

X Facebook Threads

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '당겨서 닫기' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.