The consistent minority
After Asch's conformity studies, Moscovici and colleagues (1969) showed two confederates consistently calling blue slides green shifted majority responses, but only when consistent.
Conversion theory
Moscovici (1980) argued majorities produce public compliance while minorities trigger scrutiny and later private conversion. Nemeth (1986) found minority dissent spurs divergent thinking, countering groupthink.
Evidence and extensions
Wood and colleagues (1994) found larger effects on private, indirect measures; Mugny (1982) stressed flexible negotiation styles; Martin and Hewstone (2008) offered an integrative model, with group membership mattering per social identity theory.
FAQ
- What is minority influence in simple terms?
- A few people who argue consistently can change what the majority thinks.
- How does it differ from majority influence?
- Majorities often win outward compliance; minorities prompt deeper thought and private change.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. Academic Press. The founding book.
- Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32(4), 365–380. The blue-green experiment.
- Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209–239. Conversion theory.
- Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93(1), 23–32. Minorities spur divergent thinking.
- Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 323–345. Meta-analysis.
- Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. Academic Press. Minority negotiation styles.
- Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2008). Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 237–326. An integrative model.
