Concept and proposal
Friedman (1962) proposed consolidating welfare programmes into one payment equal to a share of the gap between income and a threshold. Because support phases out gradually, it reduces the poverty trap in which working leaves people worse off. Tobin, Pechman and Mieszkowski (1967) examined practical design and cost.
Income maintenance experiments
The US ran four large experiments from 1968 to the early 1980s. Robins (1985) and Burtless (1986) found modest reductions in work hours. Forget (2011) showed that Canada's Mincome experiment in Dauphin improved health, including fewer hospitalisations. Widerquist (2005) argued results were miscommunicated politically, with only work disincentives emphasised.
Policy influence and comparison
Moffitt (2003) showed the idea was never adopted outright but shaped the Earned Income Tax Credit. Unlike a universal basic income, it pays only those with low incomes, though after-tax outcomes can be designed similarly, linking to debates on universalism and selectivism and comparisons with workfare.
FAQ
- What is a negative income tax in simple terms?
- If your income is below a threshold, you receive money from the government instead of paying tax.
- How does it differ from basic income?
- Basic income pays everyone the same; a negative income tax pays only those with low incomes, on a sliding scale.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press. The classic that popularised the negative income tax.
- Tobin, J., Pechman, J. A., & Mieszkowski, P. M. (1967). Is a negative income tax practical? The Yale Law Journal, 77(1), 1–27. Examines practical design and costs.
- Robins, P. K. (1985). A comparison of the labor supply findings from the four negative income tax experiments. The Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 567–582. Compares labour supply results across four US experiments.
- Moffitt, R. A. (2003). The negative income tax and the evolution of U.S. welfare policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 119–140. Traces NIT's influence on US welfare policy.
- Widerquist, K. (2005). A failure to communicate: What (if anything) can we learn from the negative income tax experiments? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(1), 49–81. How experimental results were misread politically.
- Forget, E. L. (2011). The town with no poverty: The health effects of a Canadian guaranteed annual income field experiment. Canadian Public Policy, 37(3), 283–305. Health effects of Canada's Mincome experiment.
- Burtless, G. (1986). The work response to a guaranteed income: A survey of experimental evidence. In A. H. Munnell (Ed.), Lessons from the income maintenance experiments (pp. 22–52). Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Surveys work responses in the experiments.
