CampusDownWiki
Total citations 14,794한국어KO 2,694EnglishEN 9,801日本語JA 767中文ZH 1,532
CampusDown ↗
English

New Economics of Labor Migration

📈 Economics By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
The new economics of labor migration holds that migration is not just an individual chasing higher wages but a joint household decision to spread income risk and overcome missing credit. Oded Stark led its development in the 1980s.
Contents
  1. 1. Core claim
  2. 2. Remittances and relative deprivation
  3. 3. Relation to other theories
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Core claim

Neoclassical theory saw migrants chasing wages. Stark and Lucas (1988) and Stark (1991) argued families send members abroad to diversify income and insure against shocks where insurance and credit markets are missing.

Remittances and relative deprivation

Remittances are part of an implicit family contract mixing altruism and insurance (Lucas & Stark, 1985). Stark and Taylor (1991) showed relative deprivation within villages drives migration, and Taylor (1999) and Taylor and colleagues (2003) found remittances raise investment and income at origin.

Relation to other theories

Massey and colleagues (1993) placed it alongside neoclassical theory, dual labor market theory and world-systems theory. It also shaped brain drain and brain gain debates.

FAQ

What is it in simple terms?
A theory that sees migration as a family strategy to share risk and raise money.
How does it differ from older theory?
It stresses families, risk, relative deprivation and remittances, not only wage gaps.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Stark, O. (1991). The migration of labor. Basil Blackwell. The book consolidating the approach.
  2. Lucas, R. E. B., & Stark, O. (1985). Motivations to remit: Evidence from Botswana. Journal of Political Economy, 93(5), 901–918. A classic on why migrants remit.
  3. Stark, O., & Lucas, R. E. B. (1988). Migration, remittances, and the family. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36(3), 465–481. The family as the unit of migration decisions.
  4. Stark, O., & Taylor, J. E. (1991). Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1163–1178. Relative deprivation drives migration.
  5. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466. Compares major migration theories.
  6. Taylor, J. E. (1999). The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. International Migration, 37(1), 63–88. Remittances in the migration process.
  7. Taylor, J. E., Rozelle, S., & de Brauw, A. (2003). Migration and incomes in source communities: A new economics of migration perspective from China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(1), 75–101. Evidence from rural China.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '신노동이주경제학' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.