Typologies
Hood (1983) classified tools by the resources government holds: Nodality (information), Authority, Treasure and Organization, the 'NATO' scheme. Vedung (1998) simplified this into regulation (sticks), economic means (carrots) and information (sermons). Salamon (2002) emphasized a 'new governance' in which governments increasingly act through third parties via indirect tools such as grants, vouchers, contracts and loan guarantees, comparing tools on coerciveness, directness, automaticity and visibility.
The logic of instrument choice
Linder and Peters (1989) argued that tool choice reflects not only technical efficiency but decision makers' perceptions, organizational culture and political context. Howlett (1991) found national patterns in tool choice tied to policy styles. Schneider and Ingram (1990) classified tools by their assumptions about why people do not act, such as lack of authority, incentives, capacity, shared values or certainty, work that led to the theory of the social construction of target populations.
New directions and critiques
Lascoumes and Le Galès (2007) argued that instruments are not neutral techniques but institutions carrying power relations and social meanings. Market-type tools spread in the New Public Management era, and nudges grounded in behavioural economics have drawn attention as a new kind of information tool. Critics say typologies are too static, since real policy works through 'policy mixes' of several tools.
FAQ
- What is policy instruments theory in simple terms?
- It classifies and compares the ways government pursues goals, such as banning by law, steering with money or persuading with information.
- What are carrots, sticks and sermons?
- Carrots are economic incentives like subsidies, sticks are regulation and penalties, and sermons are information and persuasion such as campaigns.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Hood, C. (1983). The tools of government. Macmillan. The classic NATO typology.
- Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press. A comprehensive guide to tools.
- Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9(1), 35–58. Why governments pick particular tools.
- Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529. Behavioural assumptions behind tools.
- Howlett, M. (1991). Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation: National approaches to theories of instrument choice. Policy Studies Journal, 19(2), 1–21. National policy styles and tool choice.
- Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. Instruments as institutions carrying power.
- Vedung, E. (1998). Policy instruments: Typologies and theories. In M.-L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, & E. Vedung (Eds.), Carrots, sticks, and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation (pp. 21–58). Transaction. Carrots, sticks and sermons.
