CampusDownWiki
Total citations 7,050한국어KO 2,631EnglishEN 2,503日本語JA 655中文ZH 1,261
CampusDown ↗
English

Adult attachment theory

🧠 Psychology By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Adult attachment theory proposes that the attachment processes linking infants and caregivers also operate in adult romantic relationships. Cindy Hazan and Phillip Shaver launched the field in 1987 by describing romantic love as an attachment process.
Contents
  1. 1. What is adult attachment theory?
  2. 2. Hazan and Shaver’s study
  3. 3. The four-category model and two dimensions
  4. 4. Can attachment styles change?
  5. 5. Frequently asked questions
  6. 6. References

What is adult attachment theory?

Adult attachment theory proposes that the processes by which infants form attachments to caregivers also operate in adult romantic and marital relationships. Building on Bowlby’s attachment theory, Cindy Hazan and Phillip Shaver launched the research area in 1987 by conceptualizing romantic love as an attachment process.

📌 At a glance
Meaning
Explains romantic and marital bonds in terms of attachment
Origin
Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Classic styles
Secure, anxious, avoidant
Current view
Two continuous dimensions, anxiety and avoidance

Hazan and Shaver’s study

Hazan and Shaver gathered responses through a "love quiz" printed in a newspaper. Respondents read descriptions that translated the three infant attachment patterns from the Strange Situation into adult romantic terms and chose the one most like themselves.

StyleIn romantic relationships
SecureComfortable getting close; at ease depending on others and being depended on
Anxious (anxious-ambivalent)Worries that partners do not want to be as close as they would like
AvoidantUncomfortable with closeness; reluctant to depend on others

Why do some people repeat the same pattern in every relationship? In Hazan and Shaver’s study, the proportions of the three styles resembled those found in infant research, and people who chose different styles reported different experiences of love, beliefs about relationships and memories of their parents. The results suggested that relationship expectations formed in childhood can carry into adult love.

The four-category model and two dimensions

Kim Bartholomew and Leonard Horowitz (1991) combined views of self and others into a four-category model: secure, preoccupied, dismissing-avoidant and fearful-avoidant. Today, researchers often describe people not by a single category but by scores on two dimensions: attachment anxiety (worry about rejection) and attachment avoidance (discomfort with closeness).

Can attachment styles change?

Attachment styles are fairly stable but not fixed. Trustworthy relationships and therapy can shift people toward greater security. Emotionally focused therapy applies attachment ideas to couples, and social penetration theory describes how relationships deepen.

Frequently asked questions

What is adult attachment theory?
The idea that attachment processes seen between infants and caregivers also operate in adult romantic relationships.
What are the attachment styles?
Hazan and Shaver described secure, anxious and avoidant styles; Bartholomew proposed secure, preoccupied, dismissing-avoidant and fearful-avoidant.
Can an attachment style change?
It is relatively stable, but new relationship experiences and therapy can change it.

References

  1. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.
  2. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '성인 애착이론' on CampusDown →
Bowlby's Attachment TheoryJohn Bowlby's attachment theory explained: its evolutionary basis, the four phases of attachment, internal working models, Mary Ainsworth's Strange Situation and the attachment patterns, plus later research.🧠 PsychologyEmotionally focused therapy (EFT)What is emotionally focused therapy? How Sue Johnson and Leslie Greenberg built EFT on attachment theory, the pursue–withdraw negative cycle, the three stages and nine steps, research on its effectiveness, and limits.🧠 PsychologyStrange SituationWhat is the Strange Situation? Mary Ainsworth’s eight-episode procedure, secure, avoidant, resistant and disorganized attachment, why reunion behavior matters, the Japanese findings on cultural differences, and limitations.🧠 PsychologySocial penetration theoryWhat is social penetration theory? Irwin Altman and Dalmas Taylor’s 1973 onion model, the breadth and depth of self-disclosure, stages of relationship development, reciprocity, rewards and costs, depenetration, and links to the Johari window and online self-disclosure.🧠 PsychologyIdentity status theoryWhat is identity status theory? How James Marcia (1966) turned Erikson’s ideas into research, the criteria of exploration and commitment, identity achievement, moratorium, foreclosure and diffusion, links to career choices, and limitations.🧠 PsychologyDemand–withdraw patternWhat is the demand–withdraw pattern? Christensen and Heavey’s 1990 study, gender versus social-structure explanations, Gottman’s stonewalling, the pursue–withdraw cycle in emotionally focused therapy, and ways to break it.👪 Family & Child Studies

You may also like

More on CampusDown (Korean)

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 23, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.