Snob to omnivore
Against Bourdieu (1984), Peterson (1992) found high-status omnivores and low-status univores; Peterson and Kern (1996) traced a historical shift.
Boundaries persist
Bryson (1996) showed the educated dislike genres of the least educated. Breadth itself becomes cultural capital.
Debates
Chan and Goldthorpe (2007) linked consumption to status; Warde and colleagues (2007) questioned omnivore homogeneity; Lizardo and Skiles (2012) tied it to habitus.
FAQ
- What is it in simple terms?
- Elites now enjoy everything from classical to pop, not only high culture.
- Has class distinction disappeared?
- No, broad taste itself signals status and some genres remain excluded.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press. The homology thesis the omnivore idea challenged.
- Peterson, R. A. (1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21(4), 243–258. Coined the omnivore–univore distinction.
- Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900–907. Evidence of a shift from snob to omnivore.
- Bryson, B. (1996). "Anything but heavy metal": Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 884–899. Shows exclusion persists through dislikes.
- Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). Social stratification and cultural consumption: Music in England. European Sociological Review, 23(1), 1–19. Tests the thesis with English data.
- Warde, A., Wright, D., & Gayo-Cal, M. (2007). Understanding cultural omnivorousness: Or, the myth of the cultural omnivore. Cultural Sociology, 1(2), 143–164. A critical re-examination.
- Lizardo, O., & Skiles, S. (2012). Reconceptualizing and theorizing "omnivorousness": Genetic and relational mechanisms. Sociological Theory, 30(4), 263–282. Reconnects omnivorousness to Bourdieu.
