CampusDownWiki
Total citations 20,258한국어KO 2,708EnglishEN 15,162日本語JA 792中文ZH 1,596
CampusDown ↗
English

Deadweight Loss

📈 Economics By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated Views 6
Deadweight loss, also called excess burden, is the loss of total surplus that occurs when taxes, monopoly or price controls prevent trades that would otherwise have taken place.
Contents
  1. 1. Vanishing surplus
  2. 2. Harberger triangles
  3. 3. Modern measurement
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Vanishing surplus

Trades that no longer occur destroy consumer and producer surplus. Dupuit (1844) saw losses rise with the square of the tax rate; Hotelling (1938) extended this.

Harberger triangles

Harberger (1954) estimated monopoly losses at about 0.1% of income; Hines (1999) reviews the method, used widely for monopoly and market failure.

Modern measurement

Auerbach (1985) formalised excess burden; Feldstein (1999) used the taxable-income elasticity; Slemrod and Yitzhaki (2002) added avoidance and administration costs.

FAQ

What is it in simple terms?
Value that disappears because a tax or monopoly stops trades that would have happened.
Does doubling a tax double the loss?
Roughly quadruples it, since loss scales with the square of the rate.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Dupuit, J. (1844). De la mesure de l'utilité des travaux publics. Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, 8, 332–375. The classic source of the insight that losses rise with the square of the tax rate.
  2. Hotelling, H. (1938). The general welfare in relation to problems of taxation and of railway and utility rates. Econometrica, 6(3), 242–269. A mathematical treatment of welfare costs of taxes and utility pricing.
  3. Harberger, A. C. (1954). Monopoly and resource allocation. American Economic Review, 44(2), 77–87. The first estimate of monopoly deadweight loss, popularising the Harberger triangle.
  4. Auerbach, A. J. (1985). The theory of excess burden and optimal taxation. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 1, pp. 61–127). North-Holland. A systematic chapter on measuring excess burden and optimal taxation.
  5. Hines, J. R., Jr. (1999). Three sides of Harberger triangles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 167–188. An accessible history and assessment of Harberger triangles.
  6. Feldstein, M. (1999). Tax avoidance and the deadweight loss of the income tax. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 674–680. Shows how the taxable-income elasticity captures income-tax deadweight loss.
  7. Slemrod, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1423–1470). Elsevier. Extends efficiency costs to avoidance, evasion and administration.

Found this helpful? Share it

Send it to a friend who needs it.

X Facebook Threads

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '사중손실' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.