The shape
Lakner and Milanovic (2016) found strong growth in the global middle, stagnation near the 80th percentile and a surge for the top 1%.
Winners and losers
Milanovic (2016) links this to globalization, a global extension of the Kuznets curve; Hacker and Pierson (2010) stress politics; see the trilemma.
Critiques
Corlett (2016) and Kharas and Seidel (2018) show composition effects and data updates weaken the shape; compare the Gini.
FAQ
- What is it in simple terms?
- A chart of who gained most from globalization, shaped like an elephant.
- Did rich-world workers lose?
- Their gains were small, though critics say the dip is overstated.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Lakner, C., & Milanovic, B. (2016). Global income distribution: From the fall of the Berlin Wall to the Great Recession. World Bank Economic Review, 30(2), 203–232. The original paper presenting the curve, with data and methods.
- Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University Press. A book-length interpretation of globalization and inequality built on the curve.
- Milanovic, B. (2009). Global inequality recalculated: The effect of new 2005 PPP estimates on global inequality (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5061). World Bank. Shows how PPP revisions change global inequality estimates.
- Corlett, A. (2016). Examining an elephant: Globalisation and the lower middle class of the rich world. Resolution Foundation. Re-examines how changing country composition shapes the curve, a key critique.
- Kharas, H., & Seidel, B. (2018). What's happening to the world income distribution? The elephant chart revisited (Global Economy & Development Working Paper 114). Brookings Institution. Redraws the chart with updated data, showing sensitivity of results.
- Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28. The classic on growth and inequality, for comparison with within-country theory.
- Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: Public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States. Politics & Society, 38(2), 152–204. Explains the surge in top incomes, the curve's trunk, through politics.
