CampusDownWiki
Total citations 14,771한국어KO 2,694EnglishEN 9,779日本語JA 767中文ZH 1,531
CampusDown ↗
English

Ideological Polarization

🏛️ Politics & Public Administration By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Ideological polarization is the divergence of politicians' and voters' policy positions away from the centre toward liberal and conservative poles. Measured with roll-call votes and surveys, it became a central concept for explaining US politics since the 1970s.
Contents
  1. 1. Concept and measurement
  2. 2. Are the masses polarized?
  3. 3. Sorting and causes
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Concept and measurement

Poole and Rosenthal (1984) used roll-call votes to estimate legislators' ideal points and showed the parties drifting apart. Ideological polarization concerns distance in policy positions, unlike affective polarization, which concerns hostility toward the other party.

Are the masses polarized?

DiMaggio, Evans and Bryson (1996) found most social attitudes had not polarized. Fiorina and Abrams (2008) argued elites polarized while the public stayed moderate; Abramowitz and Saunders (2008) countered that engaged voters had polarized. False polarization, overestimating the other side's extremity, also features in the debate.

Sorting and causes

Baldassarri and Gelman (2008) and Levendusky (2009) argued partisan sorting, liberals becoming Democrats and conservatives Republicans, grew more than extremity. Proposed causes include inequality (McCarty, Poole and Rosenthal, 2006), districting, media and group polarization.

FAQ

What is ideological polarization in simple terms?
Politicians and voters moving away from the centre toward opposite ends.
How does it differ from affective polarization?
Ideological polarization is about policy positions; affective polarization is about dislike of the other party's supporters.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1984). The polarization of American politics. The Journal of Politics, 46(4), 1061–1079. Early roll-call measure of elite polarization.
  2. DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans' social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690–755. Tests mass attitude polarization.
  3. Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. Argues mass polarization is overstated.
  4. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555. Rebuts the myth argument.
  5. Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. Separates partisan sorting from polarization.
  6. Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. University of Chicago Press. On partisan sorting.
  7. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press. Links polarization and inequality.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '이념적 양극화' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.