What intelligence means
In intelligence studies, intelligence is not mere data or raw information but knowledge that has been collected, evaluated and analyzed for use in policymaking. Sherman Kent (1949) described intelligence in three aspects: knowledge, the organization that produces it, and activity. Lowenthal (2022) likewise defines intelligence as the process by which information needed by policymakers is requested, collected, analyzed and provided.
Stages
- Planning and direction (requirements): policymakers decide what they need to know, and a collection plan is set by priority.
- Collection: material is gathered through human intelligence (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), imagery and geospatial intelligence (IMINT/GEOINT), measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT), open-source intelligence (OSINT) and other means.
- Processing and exploitation: collected material is turned into a usable form through decryption, translation, imagery interpretation and data organization.
- Analysis and production: source reliability is assessed and material is integrated into reports containing judgments and forecasts.
- Dissemination and feedback: products reach the users who need them in time, and their evaluations and new requirements feed the next cycle.
The U.S. joint doctrine JP 2-0 (2013) presents six activities: planning and direction, collection, processing and exploitation, analysis and production, dissemination and integration, and evaluation and feedback.
Analysis and cognitive bias
Heuer (1999) pointed out that analysts are prone to cognitive biases, such as accepting only evidence that fits existing expectations, and proposed analysis of competing hypotheses as a structured technique to reduce them. Clark (2013) proposed a target-centric approach as an alternative, in which collectors, analysts and customers collaborate around a shared model of the target.
Cash Note
청년문화예술패스 하반기 추가 발급 — 2006·2007년생 최대 20만 원, 11월 30일까지
74 readers so far
Make Korean friends & friends from around the world learning Korean
Chat easily with people from many countries who love Korea.
Beauty UP
대학생 가성비 기초 루틴 — 꼭 필요한 3단계만 남기기
215 readers so far
Psych UP
카톡 온도차 테스트|답장은 차가운데 마음은 뜨거울 수도
5 people have taken it so far
Criticism
Hulnick (2006) criticized the cycle on the grounds that policymakers often do not state clear requirements, that collection and analysis proceed in parallel, and that the way intelligence feeds into policy is not as simple as a circular diagram. Even so, the intelligence cycle is still widely used as a teaching framework for dividing intelligence work into functions and checking where each stage can fail.
References
- Kent, S. (1949). Strategic intelligence for American world policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Heuer, R. J., Jr. (1999). Psychology of intelligence analysis. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, CIA.
- Hulnick, A. S. (2006). What's wrong with the intelligence cycle. Intelligence and National Security, 21(6), 959-979.
- Clark, R. M. (2013). Intelligence analysis: A target-centric approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
- U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2013). Joint Publication 2-0: Joint intelligence. Washington, DC.
- Lowenthal, M. M. (2022). Intelligence: From secrets to policy (9th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.