CampusDownWiki
Total citations 14,936한국어KO 2,696EnglishEN 9,934日本語JA 768中文ZH 1,538
CampusDown ↗
English

Multi-Pillar Pension System

🤝 Social Welfare By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
A multi-pillar pension system spreads old-age income security across several schemes, such as basic protection, public pensions, occupational and personal pensions, to diversify risks.
Contents
  1. 1. Why pillars
  2. 2. The five-pillar revision
  3. 3. Privatisation debate
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Why pillars

The World Bank (1994) proposed public, mandatory funded and voluntary pillars to diversify risk, a frame used for Korea's National Pension and pension savings.

The five-pillar revision

Holzmann and Hinz (2005) added a zero pillar and non-financial support; Barr (2002) noted funding does not escape ageing costs. See Bismarckian and Beveridgean models.

Privatisation debate

Orszag and Stiglitz (2001) rebutted privatisation myths; Orenstein (2008) traced its spread; Ebbinghaus (2011) noted inequality risks; Holzmann (2013) surveyed reversals.

FAQ

What is it in simple terms?
Retirement income comes from state, employer and personal savings rather than one source.
Does it mean cutting public pensions?
Not necessarily; today's version stresses basic protection.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. World Bank. (1994). Averting the old age crisis: Policies to protect the old and promote growth. Oxford University Press. The report that spread the three-pillar pension model worldwide.
  2. Orszag, P. R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Rethinking pension reform: Ten myths about social security systems. In R. Holzmann & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), New ideas about old age security (pp. 17–56). World Bank. Rebuts ten myths behind pension privatisation.
  3. Barr, N. (2002). Reforming pensions: Myths, truths, and policy choices. International Social Security Review, 55(2), 3–36. Clarifies funding versus pay-as-you-go debates.
  4. Holzmann, R., & Hinz, R. (2005). Old-age income support in the 21st century: An international perspective on pension systems and reform. World Bank. Presents the revised five-pillar framework.
  5. Orenstein, M. A. (2008). Privatizing pensions: The transnational campaign for social security reform. Princeton University Press. Analyses how international actors spread pension privatisation.
  6. Ebbinghaus, B. (Ed.). (2011). The varieties of pension governance: Pension privatization in Europe. Oxford University Press. Compares the growth of private pensions across Europe.
  7. Holzmann, R. (2013). Global pension systems and their reform: Worldwide drivers, trends and challenges. International Social Security Review, 66(2), 1–29. Surveys worldwide pension reform drivers and trends.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '다층연금체계' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.