CampusDownWiki
Total citations 14,794한국어KO 2,694EnglishEN 9,801日本語JA 767中文ZH 1,532
CampusDown ↗
English

Polyarchy

🏛️ Politics & Public Administration By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Polyarchy is Robert Dahl's term for actually existing democratic regimes, as distinct from democracy as an ideal. A polyarchy scores high both on public contestation, the freedom of groups to compete openly for power, and on inclusiveness, the share of citizens entitled to participate.
Contents
  1. 1. Contestation and participation
  2. 2. Institutional guarantees
  3. 3. Measurement
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Contestation and participation

Dahl (1971) classified regimes as closed hegemonies, competitive oligarchies, inclusive hegemonies or polyarchies, building on pluralism.

Institutional guarantees

Dahl (1956, 1989) listed elected officials, free and fair elections, inclusive suffrage, the right to run, free expression, alternative information and associational autonomy, a minimal standard for democratic principles that separates polyarchy from competitive authoritarianism.

Measurement

Coppedge and Reinicke (1990) built a polyarchy scale, Munck and Verkuilen (2002) evaluated indices, Coppedge and colleagues (2008) confirmed two dimensions and Teorell and colleagues (2019) presented V-Dem's index, used in backsliding research.

FAQ

What is polyarchy in simple terms?
A real-world democracy where groups compete freely and most citizens can take part.
Why not just say democracy?
Dahl saw full democracy as an ideal no country fully reaches.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Dahl, R. A. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. University of Chicago Press. Early groundwork for the concept.
  2. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press. The defining book on polyarchy.
  3. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press. Later restatement of the institutions.
  4. Coppedge, M., & Reinicke, W. H. (1990). Measuring polyarchy. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25(1), 51–72. A scale of polyarchy.
  5. Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34. Evaluates democracy indices.
  6. Coppedge, M., Alvarez, A., & Maldonado, C. (2008). Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 632–647. Confirms Dahl's two dimensions.
  7. Teorell, J., Coppedge, M., Lindberg, S., & Skaaning, S.-E. (2019). Measuring polyarchy across the globe, 1900–2017. Studies in Comparative International Development, 54(1), 71–95. The V-Dem polyarchy index.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '다두정' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.