Origins and concept
Adam Smith (1776) held that the division of labor deepens and productivity rises as markets widen, and Allyn Young (1928) extended this into increasing returns for the economy as a whole. Verdoorn (1949) found in data for several countries a stable positive relationship between the growth of manufacturing output and the growth of labor productivity. The relationship is interpreted as reflecting dynamic economies of scale, in which specialization, learning and the adoption of technology proceed together as output expands. Arrow's (1962) learning by doing formalized a similar mechanism.
Kaldor's growth laws and cumulative causation
Analyzing Britain's slow growth, Kaldor (1966) set out three laws: manufacturing growth drives overall growth; growth of manufacturing output raises manufacturing productivity (Verdoorn's law); and expansion of manufacturing raises productivity in other sectors. Dixon and Thirlwall (1975) combined this with export demand to build a model of cumulative causation, in which regions that start ahead raise competitiveness through productivity gains and attract still more demand. The idea connects to Thirlwall's law and path dependence.
Empirical debate and modern significance
Rowthorn (1975) criticized Kaldor's estimates as relying heavily on outliers such as Japan, while Kaldor (1975) replied that treating output as the independent variable was correct because employment growth is determined by demand. McCombie (1982) identified the static–dynamic Verdoorn law paradox, in which estimates using levels of time-series data show constant returns while estimates using growth rates show increasing returns. Fingleton and McCombie (1998) and Angeriz, McCombie and Roberts (2008) found substantial increasing returns and spatial spillovers in European regional data. Romer's (1986) model of increasing returns expressed similar ideas within the framework of endogenous growth theory.
FAQ
- What is Verdoorn's law in simple terms?
- It is the empirical rule that the faster factories increase their output, the faster output per worker rises.
- Why does it matter?
- Because output growth and productivity growth reinforce each other, it helps explain why growth gaps between countries and regions can widen cumulatively.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Verdoorn, P. J. (1949). Fattori che regolano lo sviluppo della produttività del lavoro. L'Industria, 1, 3–10.
- Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
- Young, A. A. (1928). Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal, 38(152), 527–542.
- Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.
- Rowthorn, R. E. (1975). What remains of Kaldor's law? Economic Journal, 85(337), 10–19.
- Kaldor, N. (1975). Economic growth and the Verdoorn law: A comment on Mr Rowthorn's article. Economic Journal, 85(340), 891–896.
- Dixon, R., & Thirlwall, A. P. (1975). A model of regional growth-rate differences on Kaldorian lines. Oxford Economic Papers, 27(2), 201–214.
- McCombie, J. S. L. (1982). Economic growth, Kaldor's laws and the static-dynamic Verdoorn law paradox. Applied Economics, 14(3), 279–294.
- Fingleton, B., & McCombie, J. S. L. (1998). Increasing returns and economic growth: Some evidence for manufacturing from the European Union regions. Oxford Economic Papers, 50(1), 89–105.
- McCombie, J. S. L., Pugno, M., & Soro, B. (Eds.). (2002). Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on Verdoorn's Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Angeriz, A., McCombie, J. S. L., & Roberts, M. (2008). New estimates of returns to scale and spatial spillovers for EU regional manufacturing, 1986–2002. International Regional Science Review, 31(1), 62–87.
- Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
