What is it in simple terms?

Ceasing to want what you could never have.

Why does it matter for welfare?

Satisfaction reports can mask real deprivation.

Adaptive Preferences

🤝 Social Welfare By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated October 27, 2026

Adaptive preferences arise when people facing long-term restricted opportunities lower what they want to match their conditions, making subjective satisfaction an unreliable measure of welfare.

Contents

1. Sour grapes
2. Welfare measurement
3. Paternalism
4. FAQ
5. References

Sour grapes

Elster (1983); related to hedonic adaptation and learned helplessness.

Welfare measurement

Sen (1985, 1999) argues satisfaction hides deprivation, motivating the capability approach; Nussbaum (2001).

Paternalism

Khader (2011), Teschl and Comim (2005), and Bruckner's (2009) defence.

FAQ

What is it in simple terms?: Ceasing to want what you could never have.
Why does it matter for welfare?: Satisfaction reports can mask real deprivation.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge University Press. The founding 'sour grapes' account of preferences adjusting to options.
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. North-Holland. Argues for assessing welfare by capabilities rather than utility.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 5 Adaptive preferences and women's options. Economics and Philosophy, 17(1), 67–88. Uses women's constrained expectations to analyse the problem.
Khader, S. J. (2011). Adaptive preferences and women's empowerment. Oxford University Press. Proposes criteria so interventions avoid paternalism.
Teschl, M., & Comim, F. (2005). Adaptive preferences and capabilities: Some preliminary conceptual explorations. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 229–247. Distinguishes types of adaptation in relation to capabilities.
Bruckner, D. W. (2009). In defense of adaptive preferences. Philosophical Studies, 142(3), 307–324. Defends adaptive preferences as not always irrational.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. Shows why subjective satisfaction alone cannot judge deprivation.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '적응적 선호' on CampusDown →

Capability ApproachWhat the capability approach is: Sen and Nussbaum's view that well-being and justice should be judged by what people can actually do and be, not income or utility. Concepts and critiques.🤝 Social Welfare Hedonic AdaptationWhat hedonic adaptation is: emotional reactions to good and bad events fade so happiness returns toward baseline. The hedonic treadmill, the lottery winner study, revisions to set-point theory and limits.🧠 Psychology Learned HelplessnessWhat is learned helplessness? Seligman and Maier’s 1967 experiment, the human noise studies, the 1978 attributional reformulation, the 2016 neuroscience update, classroom and workplace examples, and evidence-based ways to regain a sense of control.🧠 Psychology Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems TheoryBronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory explained: micro-, meso-, exo-, macro- and chronosystems, the bioecological (PPCT) model, ecomaps, criticisms, and report examples.🤝 Social Welfare

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.