Concept
From 'ad hoc' and '-cracy', adhocracy is the opposite of Weber's bureaucracy. Bennis and Slater (1968) proposed it as the organisation of the future, Toffler popularised it in Future Shock, and Mintzberg (1979) made it one of his five structural configurations.
Compared with bureaucracy
- Structure: flat teams rather than vertical hierarchy.
- Formalisation: mutual adjustment among experts instead of rules.
- Authority: based on expertise, not position.
- Duration: often temporary, dissolving when the task ends.
Pros, cons and welfare uses
It handles fast-changing, complex problems creatively but can blur accountability and raise conflict and anxiety. Welfare agencies use it in disaster task forces, integrated case management teams and multi-agency community projects.
References
- Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
- Bennis, W. G., & Slater, P. E. (1968). The Temporary Society. Harper & Row.
- Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. Random House.