CampusDownWiki CampusDown ↗
English

Adhocracy (Social Welfare Administration Theory)

🤝 Social Welfare By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Quick answer: an adhocracy is a flexible organisation where expert teams form around problems and disband when done, instead of fixed rules and hierarchy.
Contents
  1. 1. Concept
  2. 2. Compared with bureaucracy
  3. 3. Pros, cons and welfare uses
  4. 4. References

Concept

From 'ad hoc' and '-cracy', adhocracy is the opposite of Weber's bureaucracy. Bennis and Slater (1968) proposed it as the organisation of the future, Toffler popularised it in Future Shock, and Mintzberg (1979) made it one of his five structural configurations.

Compared with bureaucracy

  • Structure: flat teams rather than vertical hierarchy.
  • Formalisation: mutual adjustment among experts instead of rules.
  • Authority: based on expertise, not position.
  • Duration: often temporary, dissolving when the task ends.

Pros, cons and welfare uses

It handles fast-changing, complex problems creatively but can blur accountability and raise conflict and anxiety. Welfare agencies use it in disaster task forces, integrated case management teams and multi-agency community projects.

References

  1. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
  2. Bennis, W. G., & Slater, P. E. (1968). The Temporary Society. Harper & Row.
  3. Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. Random House.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '애드호크라시' on CampusDown →

You may also like

This article was last updated on October 15, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.