CampusDownWiki CampusDown ↗
English

Experimental Design: True, Quasi- and Pre-Experimental

👥 Sociology By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Quick answer: Experimental designs test cause and effect by manipulating a treatment and comparing with a control group; they are classed as true, quasi- or pre-experimental by whether random assignment and controls are used.
Contents
  1. 1. Conditions for causality
  2. 2. Pre-experimental designs
  3. 3. True experimental designs
  4. 4. Quasi-experimental designs
  5. 5. Validity
  6. 6. References

Conditions for causality

A cause must precede its effect, the variables must covary, and rival explanations must be ruled out. Experiments use control groups and random assignment to meet the third condition, a core idea of quantitative research.

Pre-experimental designs

  • One-shot case study: X O.
  • One-group pretest-posttest: O X O; cannot rule out history or maturation.
  • Static-group comparison: posttest-only comparison without random assignment.

True experimental designs

  • Pretest-posttest control group: R O X O / R O O.
  • Posttest-only control group: R X O / R O, avoiding testing effects.
  • Solomon four-group: combines both to separate pretest and treatment effects.
  • Factorial designs test several factors and their interactions.

Quasi-experimental designs

Used when randomisation is impractical: nonequivalent control group (O X O / O O), interrupted time series (O O O X O O O) and control-series designs, common in programme evaluation.

Validity

Stronger designs better control threats to internal validity such as history, maturation, testing, instrumentation, regression, selection and attrition, though artificial settings can reduce external validity. Human experiments also need ethical review.

References

  1. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally.
  2. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
  3. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2017). Research Methods for Social Work (9th ed.). Cengage.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '실험설계' on CampusDown →

You may also like

This article was last updated on October 15, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.