Cooley's three steps
Cooley (1902) described imagining our appearance to others, imagining their judgement and feeling pride or mortification, so the self arises in social relations.
Interactionist development
Mead (1934) grounded symbolic interactionism in role-taking, and Kinch (1963) formalized the idea. It is discussed alongside self-perception theory and social comparison theory.
Evidence
Shrauger and Schoeneman (1979) found self-views track perceived more than actual appraisals. Felson (1985) and Yeung and Martin (2003) tested the model, and Leary and Baumeister (2000) treated self-esteem as a sociometer.
FAQ
- What is the looking-glass self in simple terms?
- We form our self-image by imagining how others see us.
- Do others' judgements fix our self-concept?
- Research suggests what we think others think matters more than their actual views.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Charles Scribner's Sons. The book that introduced the concept.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press. Self formed by taking the attitude of others.
- Kinch, J. W. (1963). A formalized theory of the self-concept. American Journal of Sociology, 68(4), 481–486. Formalizes the idea into testable propositions.
- Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 549–573. Review: self-views track perceived more than actual appraisals.
- Felson, R. B. (1985). Reflected appraisal and the development of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(1), 71–78. Tests reflected appraisals' effects.
- Yeung, K.-T., & Martin, J. L. (2003). The looking glass self: An empirical test and elaboration. Social Forces, 81(3), 843–879. A network-based empirical test.
- Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–62. Self-esteem as a gauge of acceptance.
