CampusDownWiki
Total citations 7,045한국어KO 2,629EnglishEN 2,502日本語JA 654中文ZH 1,260
CampusDown ↗
English

Psychological safety

🧠 Psychology By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Psychological safety is a shared belief among team members that it is safe to take interpersonal risks, such as asking questions, admitting mistakes or voicing dissent. Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson established it as a team-level construct in a 1999 study.
Contents
  1. 1. What is psychological safety?
  2. 2. Edmondson’s study
  3. 3. Common misconceptions
  4. 4. Link with groupthink
  5. 5. How to build it
  6. 6. Frequently asked questions
  7. 7. References

What is psychological safety?

Psychological safety is a shared belief among team members that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking, so that asking questions, admitting mistakes or raising concerns will not lead to embarrassment or punishment. Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson established it as a team-level construct in her 1999 study.

📌 At a glance
Meaning
A team’s shared belief that interpersonal risk-taking is safe
Established by
Edmondson (1999)
Field
Organizational behavior, I-O psychology
Key outcomes
Team learning behavior and performance

Edmondson’s study

Edmondson studied 51 work teams in a manufacturing company, using surveys, interviews and observation. The model looked like this:

StepContent
Psychological safetyThe belief that "it’s okay to take risks on this team"
Learning behaviorSeeking feedback, sharing information, asking for help, discussing errors, experimenting
Team performancePerformance improves through learning behavior

Why does psychological safety lead to better performance? In Edmondson’s (1999) study, psychological safety was associated with team learning behavior, and learning behavior helped connect psychological safety with team performance. When members feel safe, they ask questions, surface problems and try new approaches, so the team learns more and performs better.

Common misconceptions

  • "It just means being nice": psychological safety is not about pleasant talk. It is about being able to say uncomfortable things.
  • "It means lowering standards": high standards and psychological safety can coexist. High standards with low safety tend to make people hide mistakes.
  • "It’s a personality trait": unlike individual confidence, it is a climate shared by the team.

When psychological safety is low, people hold back dissent, making groupthink and conformity more likely. Teams where anyone can raise a problem can correct bad decisions early.

How to build it

  1. Frame work as a learning problem: say clearly that the task is uncertain and everyone’s input is needed.
  2. Leaders acknowledge their own fallibility: asking "What might I be missing?" makes it easier for others to speak.
  3. Respond appreciatively: thank people who bring bad news instead of blaming them.
  4. Distinguish errors from violations: treat honest mistakes as learning opportunities while holding deliberate violations accountable. See also leadership theories.

Frequently asked questions

What is psychological safety?
It is a shared belief that team members can ask questions, admit mistakes or disagree without being humiliated or punished.
Who developed the concept of team psychological safety?
Amy Edmondson of Harvard Business School, through a 1999 study of 51 work teams.
Does psychological safety mean lower standards?
No. High standards and psychological safety can go together, and teams learn best when both are high.

References

  1. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '심리적 안전감' on CampusDown →
GroupthinkWhat is groupthink? Irving Janis’s definition, the conditions that cause it, its eight symptoms, classic cases such as the Bay of Pigs invasion and the Challenger launch, criticisms from later research, and practical ways to prevent it in teams and classrooms.🧠 PsychologyAsch Conformity ExperimentSolomon Asch’s line-judgment conformity experiment explained: the procedure, why about a third of answers on critical trials went with a wrong majority, how one ally cut conformity, cross-cultural meta-analysis and lessons for meetings.🧠 PsychologySocial LoafingWhat is social loafing? The Ringelmann effect, Latané’s clapping and shouting experiments, why people put in less effort in groups, what Karau and Williams’ meta-analysis found, and practical ways to curb free-riding in group projects.🧠 PsychologyLeadership Theories: Trait, Behavioral and ContingencyThe main leadership theories in order: trait theory, the Ohio State and Michigan studies and the Managerial Grid, Fiedler's contingency model, Hersey-Blanchard, path-goal theory, transformational leadership and LMX, with original sources.💼 BusinessImpostor syndromeWhat is impostor syndrome? Clance and Imes’s 1978 study of high-achieving women, common thoughts and behaviors, the impostor cycle, what a 2020 systematic review of 62 studies found about prevalence and related problems, and evidence-informed ways to cope.🧠 PsychologyHerzberg’s two-factor theoryWhat is Herzberg’s two-factor (motivation-hygiene) theory? The 1959 Pittsburgh study, motivators such as achievement and recognition, hygiene factors such as pay and working conditions, job enrichment, comparison with Maslow, and criticisms.💼 Business

You may also like

More on CampusDown (Korean)

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 23, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.