Townsend's definition
Townsend (1962, 1979) defined poverty as lacking resources for customary diets, activities and living conditions, finding deprivation rising sharply below an income level. Runciman's (1966) relative deprivation stressed reference groups.
Measurement
The OECD and EU use 50 or 60 per cent of median income, so the line rises with prosperity. Brady (2003) argued relative measures better capture exclusion and Atkinson (1987) showed results depend on line choice.
The debate
Sen (1983) argued poverty is absolute in capabilities but relative in commodities. Ravallion and Chen (2011) proposed weakly relative lines. The concept anchors debates on social exclusion and redistribution.
FAQ
- What is relative poverty in simple terms?
- Not starving, but living far below what is normal in your society.
- Why use the median?
- The mean is pulled up by high earners; the median better reflects typical living standards.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Townsend, P. (1962). The meaning of poverty. British Journal of Sociology, 13(3), 210–227. Redefines poverty socially.
- Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. Penguin. The deprivation survey.
- Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Relative deprivation.
- Sen, A. (1983). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(2), 153–169. Absolute vs relative debate.
- Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 55(4), 749–764. Sensitivity to poverty lines.
- Brady, D. (2003). Rethinking the sociological measurement of poverty. Social Forces, 81(3), 715–751. Sociological measurement.
- Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2011). Weakly relative poverty. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1251–1261. Weakly relative lines.
