Conditions
Schattschneider (1942) held modern democracy unthinkable without parties. The model requires distinct programmes, cohesive parties, policy voting and implementation, close to retrospective voting.
The 1950 report
The APSA (1950) urged reform toward British-style responsible parties. Ranney (1954) traced the doctrine; Kirkpatrick (1971) criticised the report and Pomper (1971) saw US parties moving closer to the model.
Evidence and change
Dalton (1985) compared elite-supporter congruence in nine nations, Adams (2001) modelled competition with party identification, and Thomassen and van Ham (2014) traced changing representation alongside cartel party debates.
FAQ
- What is responsible party government in simple terms?
- Parties make clear promises, carry them out if they win and are judged at the next election.
- Are US parties responsible parties?
- Once criticised as loose, they have grown more polarised and cohesive, meeting some conditions.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party government. Farrar and Rinehart. Classic case for party government.
- American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties. (1950). Toward a more responsible two-party system. American Political Science Review, 44(3, Pt. 2). The APSA reform report.
- Ranney, A. (1954). The doctrine of responsible party government: Its origins and present state. University of Illinois Press. History of the doctrine.
- Kirkpatrick, E. M. (1971). "Toward a more responsible two-party system": Political science, policy science, or pseudo-science? American Political Science Review, 65(4), 965–990. A critique of the report.
- Pomper, G. M. (1971). Toward a more responsible two-party system? What, again? Journal of Politics, 33(4), 916–940. Assesses movement toward the model.
- Dalton, R. J. (1985). Political parties and political representation: Party supporters and party elites in nine nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18(3), 267–299. Cross-national test of party representation.
- Adams, J. (2001). Party competition and responsible party government: A theory of spatial competition based upon insights from behavioral voting research. University of Michigan Press. A spatial-competition analysis.
- Thomassen, J., & van Ham, C. (2014). Failing political representation or a change in kind? Models of representation and empirical trends in Europe. West European Politics, 37(2), 400–419. Recent European trends.
