CampusDownWiki
Total citations 14,936한국어KO 2,696EnglishEN 9,934日本語JA 768中文ZH 1,538
CampusDown ↗
English

Responsible Party Government

🏛️ Politics & Public Administration By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Responsible party government is a theory of democratic accountability in which parties compete on distinct policy programmes, voters choose among them, the winning party acts cohesively to implement its promises, and it is then judged on the results at the next election.
Contents
  1. 1. Conditions
  2. 2. The 1950 report
  3. 3. Evidence and change
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Conditions

Schattschneider (1942) held modern democracy unthinkable without parties. The model requires distinct programmes, cohesive parties, policy voting and implementation, close to retrospective voting.

The 1950 report

The APSA (1950) urged reform toward British-style responsible parties. Ranney (1954) traced the doctrine; Kirkpatrick (1971) criticised the report and Pomper (1971) saw US parties moving closer to the model.

Evidence and change

Dalton (1985) compared elite-supporter congruence in nine nations, Adams (2001) modelled competition with party identification, and Thomassen and van Ham (2014) traced changing representation alongside cartel party debates.

FAQ

What is responsible party government in simple terms?
Parties make clear promises, carry them out if they win and are judged at the next election.
Are US parties responsible parties?
Once criticised as loose, they have grown more polarised and cohesive, meeting some conditions.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party government. Farrar and Rinehart. Classic case for party government.
  2. American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties. (1950). Toward a more responsible two-party system. American Political Science Review, 44(3, Pt. 2). The APSA reform report.
  3. Ranney, A. (1954). The doctrine of responsible party government: Its origins and present state. University of Illinois Press. History of the doctrine.
  4. Kirkpatrick, E. M. (1971). "Toward a more responsible two-party system": Political science, policy science, or pseudo-science? American Political Science Review, 65(4), 965–990. A critique of the report.
  5. Pomper, G. M. (1971). Toward a more responsible two-party system? What, again? Journal of Politics, 33(4), 916–940. Assesses movement toward the model.
  6. Dalton, R. J. (1985). Political parties and political representation: Party supporters and party elites in nine nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18(3), 267–299. Cross-national test of party representation.
  7. Adams, J. (2001). Party competition and responsible party government: A theory of spatial competition based upon insights from behavioral voting research. University of Michigan Press. A spatial-competition analysis.
  8. Thomassen, J., & van Ham, C. (2014). Failing political representation or a change in kind? Models of representation and empirical trends in Europe. West European Politics, 37(2), 400–419. Recent European trends.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '책임정당정부 모형' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.