What is social disorganization theory in simple terms?

In poor neighborhoods where residents move in and out often, neighbors barely know each other and lose the collective capacity to keep order, so crime rises. The theory looks for causes of crime in neighborhood conditions rather than individuals.

How does it differ from broken windows theory?

Social disorganization theory focuses on how structural conditions such as poverty, mobility and heterogeneity weaken a community's informal control, while broken windows theory focuses on how leaving minor disorder such as graffiti or broken windows unaddressed leads to more serious crime.

Social Disorganization Theory

👥 Sociology By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated October 27, 2026

Social disorganization theory is a criminological theory that locates the causes of crime in the characteristics of communities rather than individuals. It holds that when conditions such as poverty, frequent residential turnover and racial and ethnic heterogeneity weaken neighborhood ties and shared values, the informal social control through which residents maintain order breaks down and crime and delinquency increase. It began with the Chicago School's urban research in the 1920s to 1940s, especially Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay's studies of juvenile delinquency, and regained attention through collective efficacy research from the 1990s.

Contents

1. The Chicago School and delinquency areas
2. Core causes and informal control
3. Decline, revival and collective efficacy
4. FAQ
5. References

The Chicago School and delinquency areas

Park, Burgess and McKenzie (1925) viewed the city as an ecosystem in which groups compete for space, proposing a model of concentric zones spreading outward from the center. Using this framework to analyze Chicago's juvenile delinquency data, Shaw and McKay (1942) found that delinquency was highest in the zone in transition surrounding the downtown and industrial areas. Remarkably, delinquency stayed high even though the immigrant groups living there changed over decades. The causes of crime thus lay not in the traits of particular groups but in the conditions of the areas themselves.

Core causes and informal control

Shaw and McKay identified low economic status, residential mobility and racial and ethnic heterogeneity as the core causes of social disorganization. When residents turn over frequently and come from different backgrounds, neighborly relations and local organizations struggle to take root, and adults' collective capacity to watch over children and correct deviance weakens. Kornhauser (1978) interpreted the theory's core as the weakening of community control rather than the transmission of delinquent culture, distinguishing it from cultural explanations such as differential association theory. It can be seen as moving social control theory, which emphasizes individual bonds, to the community level.

Decline, revival and collective efficacy

In the 1960s and 1970s, as individual-level theories became dominant, the theory declined amid criticism that it wrongly generalized area characteristics to individual behavior. Bursik (1988) noted problems such as the failure to measure disorganization directly but also outlined prospects for revival. Using British data, Sampson and Groves (1989) provided the first direct test showing that structural conditions affect crime through mediating processes such as friendship networks, supervision of teenage peer groups and organizational participation. Sampson and colleagues (1997) showed that neighborhoods with higher collective efficacy, combining mutual trust and willingness to intervene, have less violent crime. Kubrin and Weitzer (2003) proposed incorporating political and economic forces beyond the neighborhood and the role of culture.

FAQ

What is social disorganization theory in simple terms?: In poor neighborhoods where residents move in and out often, neighbors barely know each other and lose the collective capacity to keep order, so crime rises. The theory looks for causes of crime in neighborhood conditions rather than individuals.
How does it differ from broken windows theory?: Social disorganization theory focuses on how structural conditions such as poverty, mobility and heterogeneity weaken a community's informal control, while broken windows theory focuses on how leaving minor disorder such as graffiti or broken windows unaddressed leads to more serious crime.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. The Chicago School's urban ecology classic.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. The founding study of persistent neighborhood delinquency rates.
Kornhauser, R. R. (1978). Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Models. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Recasts the theory as a control model.
Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519–552. Problems and prospects of the theory.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802. The first direct test of mediating mechanisms.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. Collective efficacy as the modern extension.
Kubrin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374–402. A review of new directions.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '사회해체이론' on CampusDown →

Collective EfficacyWhat collective efficacy is: neighbors' mutual trust and willingness to act together reduce crime. Covers Sampson's 1997 Chicago study, social disorganization theory, the difference from social capital, the paradox of networks and comparison with Bandura's group efficacy.👥 Sociology Broken Windows TheoryWhat is the broken windows theory? Learn its 1982 origins with Wilson and Kelling, Zimbardo’s abandoned car experiment, how New York applied it to the subway and NYPD, what research shows, the criticism, and uses beyond policing.👥 Sociology Routine activity theoryRoutine activity theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979): motivated offender, suitable target and absence of a capable guardian; rising US crime in the 1960s–70s; the crime triangle; situational prevention, CPTED and criticisms.👥 Sociology Differential association theoryEdwin Sutherland’s differential association theory: nine propositions, frequency, duration, priority and intensity, white-collar crime, Akers’ social learning theory, Glaser’s differential identification, and criticisms.👥 Sociology Social control theorySocial control (social bond) theory holds that delinquency occurs when a person’s bonds to family, school and society weaken.📄 Other

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.