CampusDownWiki
Total citations 14,939한국어KO 2,696EnglishEN 9,934日本語JA 768中文ZH 1,541
CampusDown ↗
English

Stealth Democracy

🏛️ Politics & Public Administration By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Stealth democracy, coined by Hibbing and Theiss-Morse, is the claim that many citizens prefer decisions made quietly and efficiently by non-self-interested actors rather than participating in political debate.
Contents
  1. 1. Process preferences
  2. 2. Deliberation debate
  3. 3. Populism and critiques
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Process preferences

Hibbing (2001) and Hibbing and Theiss-Morse (2002) find citizens dislike visible conflict.

Deliberation debate

It clashes with deliberative democracy; Neblo et al. (2010) find appetite for deliberation; Font et al. (2015), Bengtsson and Mattila (2009); compare sortition.

Populism and critiques

Webb (2013) links it to populism; VanderMolen (2017) questions measures.

FAQ

What is it in simple terms?
Wanting a quiet, efficient government rather than taking part.
Do citizens really dislike participation?
Many want to deliberate when given the chance.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge University Press. The original book introducing the concept and its survey evidence.
  2. Hibbing, J. R. (2001). Process preferences and American politics: What the people want government to be. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 145–153. Argues process preferences matter as much as policy preferences.
  3. Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., Kennedy, R. P., Lazer, D. M. J., & Sokhey, A. E. (2010). Who wants to deliberate—and why? American Political Science Review, 104(3), 566–583. Rebuts the thesis, showing many citizens want to deliberate.
  4. Bengtsson, Å., & Mattila, M. (2009). Direct democracy and its critics: Support for direct democracy and 'stealth' democracy in Finland. West European Politics, 32(5), 1031–1048. Finnish evidence contrasting direct and stealth democracy support.
  5. Font, J., Wojcieszak, M., & Navarro, C. J. (2015). Participation, representation and expertise: Citizen preferences for political decision-making processes. Political Studies, 63(1_suppl), 153–172. Analyses preferences for participatory, representative and expert decision-making.
  6. VanderMolen, K. (2017). Stealth democracy revisited: Reconsidering preferences for less visible government. Political Research Quarterly, 70(3), 687–698. Re-examines the measures and validity of the concept.
  7. Webb, P. (2013). Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research, 52(6), 747–772. Distinguishes dissatisfied and stealth democrats in the UK, linking to populism.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '스텔스 민주주의' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.