What is the theory of the gift in simple terms?

Gifts look free but create a duty to repay, and this giving and returning builds relationships.

Yes, to holiday gifts, wedding money, blood donation and favours at work.

The Gift (Mauss)

👥 Sociology By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated October 27, 2026

The theory of the gift, set out by Marcel Mauss in his 1925 essay The Gift, holds that gift exchange is not mere generosity but a total social fact made of obligations to give, to receive and to reciprocate, a basic principle binding people and groups together.

Contents

1. Three obligations
2. Kula and potlatch
3. Modern extensions
4. FAQ
5. References

Three obligations

Mauss (1925) identified obligations to give, receive and repay; refusing a gift rejects a relationship and failing to repay costs status. He saw gift exchange as a total social fact spanning economy, law, religion and morality.

Kula and potlatch

Mauss drew on the kula ring documented by Malinowski (1922) and on the potlatch, where lavish giving won rank. Sahlins (1972) distinguished generalised, balanced and negative reciprocity.

Modern extensions

Gouldner (1960) described a near-universal norm of reciprocity, feeding social exchange theory and reciprocal altruism. Titmuss (1970) argued unpaid blood donation builds solidarity, Akerlof (1982) modelled labour as gift exchange and Molm (2003) linked reciprocal exchange to trust and social capital.

FAQ

What is the theory of the gift in simple terms?: Gifts look free but create a duty to repay, and this giving and returning builds relationships.
Does it apply today?: Yes, to holiday gifts, wedding money, blood donation and favours at work.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1925) The original work.
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Routledge. The kula ethnography.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. The norm of reciprocity.
Titmuss, R. M. (1970). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. Allen & Unwin. Blood donation as gift.
Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Aldine-Atherton. Types of reciprocity.
Akerlof, G. A. (1982). Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(4), 543–569. Gift exchange in labour.
Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 1–17. Compares forms of exchange.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '증여론' on CampusDown →

Social exchange theoryWhat is social exchange theory? Contributions of Homans (1958), Thibaut and Kelley (1959) and Blau (1964), rewards and costs, comparison level and comparison level for alternatives, reciprocity, power, applications and criticisms.🧠 Psychology Reciprocal AltruismWhat reciprocal altruism is: how costly help can evolve among non-relatives when it is returned later, Trivers's conditions, Axelrod's tournaments, animal evidence and debate, Nowak's five rules and human reciprocity.🔬 Natural Sciences Social CapitalSocial capital explained: Bourdieu's forms of capital, Coleman's norms and closure, Putnam's civic engagement and Bowling Alone, bonding, bridging and linking capital, Granovetter's weak ties, measurement and critiques.👥 Sociology Symbolic interactionismSymbolic interactionism: Blumer’s three premises, Mead’s I and Me, Cooley’s looking-glass self, the Thomas theorem, Goffman and labeling theory, compared with functionalism and conflict theory.👥 Sociology

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.