CampusDownWiki CampusDown ↗
English

Traditional (Substantive-Law) Theory of the Subject Matter of Litigation

⚖️ Law By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Quick answer: the traditional (old substantive-law) theory identifies the subject matter of a lawsuit by each substantive right the plaintiff asserts. Claims for the same money based on different rights are different subjects of litigation. It is the basic position of the Korean Supreme Court.
Contents
  1. 1. What is the subject matter of litigation?
  2. 2. The traditional theory
  3. 3. Examples: concurrence of claims
  4. 4. Consequences
  5. 5. Case law and evaluation
  6. 6. References

What is the subject matter of litigation?

The subject matter of litigation (Streitgegenstand) is what the court adjudicates: the plaintiff's claim. Whether two claims share the same subject matter decides duplicate-suit bans (Korean Civil Procedure Act art. 259), amendment of claims (art. 262), joinder, the objective scope of res judicata (art. 216) and the bar on refiling after withdrawal (art. 267(2)).

The traditional theory

Inherited from German common-law doctrine, the traditional theory treats the subject matter as the assertion of a substantive-law right or legal relationship. If the asserted right differs, the subject matter differs even when the relief sought is identical.

Examples: concurrence of claims

  • An injured taxi passenger's contract claim and tort claim for the same loss are separate subjects of litigation.
  • Claims to register transfer of the same property based on sale and on prescriptive acquisition are separate.
  • A claim on a promissory note and on the underlying debt are separate.

Consequences

IssueResult under the traditional theory
Duplicate suitsParallel suits on different rights are not duplicates.
AmendmentSwitching the legal basis is an amendment of the claim.
Res judicataLosing on contract does not bar a later tort suit.
Scope of judgmentGranting relief on an unasserted right may violate the principle of party disposition.

Case law and evaluation

The Korean Supreme Court generally follows the traditional theory while limiting repeated litigation through res judicata, good faith and alternative joinder. The theory fits the substantive-law system and gives a clear object of judgment, but it allows one dispute to generate several suits and burdens plaintiffs with legal characterization. These criticisms produced the new theory.

References

  1. 민사소송법 제216조, 제259조, 제262조, 제267조 (국가법령정보센터 law.go.kr).
  2. 이시윤 (2023). 『신민사소송법』 (제16판). 박영사.
  3. 정동윤·유병현·김경욱 (2022). 『민사소송법』 (제9판). 법문사.
  4. Rosenberg, L., Schwab, K. H., & Gottwald, P. (2018). Zivilprozessrecht (18. Aufl.). C.H. Beck.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '구소송물이론' on CampusDown →

You may also like

This article was last updated on October 15, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.