CampusDownWiki
Total citations 20,270한국어KO 2,708EnglishEN 15,169日本語JA 794中文ZH 1,599
CampusDown ↗
English

Yardstick Competition

🏛️ Politics & Public Administration By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated Views 6
Yardstick competition occurs when voters, unable to observe their own government's performance directly, use neighbouring governments as benchmarks, leading governments to track each other's tax rates and policies.
Contents
  1. 1. Origins
  2. 2. Elections and taxes
  3. 3. Versus tax competition
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Origins

Shleifer (1985) proposed benchmarking regulated firms; Salmon (1987) applied it to decentralised government.

Elections and taxes

Besley and Case (1995) showed voters punish governors who raise taxes above neighbours, adding a benchmark to retrospective voting; Bordignon and colleagues (2003) found it where elections are competitive.

Versus tax competition

Brueckner (2003) distinguished it from tax competition; unlike the Tiebout model it works through the ballot. Allers and Elhorst (2005) found Dutch evidence.

FAQ

What is it in simple terms?
Voters ask why their taxes are higher than next door's, so governments watch their neighbours.
How is it different from tax competition?
Tax competition chases mobile capital; yardstick competition follows voter comparisons.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Shleifer, A. (1985). A theory of yardstick competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 16(3), 319–327. The original regulatory formulation.
  2. Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralisation as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 24–43. Applies the idea to decentralised government.
  3. Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45. Key evidence that voters compare neighbouring tax rates.
  4. Brueckner, J. K. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 175–188. Distinguishes yardstick from other interactions.
  5. Bordignon, M., Cerniglia, F., & Revelli, F. (2003). In search of yardstick competition: A spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(2), 199–217. Shows the effect depends on electoral competition.
  6. Allers, M. A., & Elhorst, J. P. (2005). Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among local governments in the Netherlands. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 493–513. Dutch evidence.
  7. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. The classic on fiscal federalism.

Found this helpful? Share it

Send it to a friend who needs it.

X Facebook Threads

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '기준경쟁' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.