The yardstick group
Hyman (1942) coined the term; Merton (1968) distinguished normative from comparative reference groups and described anticipatory socialisation.
Relative deprivation
The American Soldier (Stouffer et al., 1949) found more-promoted units less satisfied; Runciman (1966) advanced relative deprivation; Shibutani (1955) treated groups as perspectives.
Economics of comparison
Clark and Oswald (1996) and Luttmer (2005) show comparison income lowers well-being, informing the Easterlin paradox and social comparison theory.
FAQ
- What is it in simple terms?
- The group you compare yourself with when judging how you are doing.
- Must it be my own group?
- No; aspirational groups or neighbours can serve as reference groups.
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26
References
- Hyman, H. H. (1942). The psychology of status. Archives of Psychology, 269, 1–94. The study that coined the term reference group.
- Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press. Contains the famous finding that units with more promotion were less satisfied.
- Shibutani, T. (1955). Reference groups as perspectives. American Journal of Sociology, 60(6), 562–569. Reinterprets reference groups as perspectives, linking them to interactionism.
- Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure (Enlarged ed.). Free Press. Includes the chapters systematising normative and comparative reference groups.
- Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Shows how choice of comparison group shapes perceptions of inequality in Britain.
- Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381. Econometric evidence that comparison income lowers job satisfaction.
- Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002. Finds higher neighbours' earnings reduce one's own well-being.
