CampusDownWiki
Total citations 14,841한국어KO 2,694EnglishEN 9,846日本語JA 768中文ZH 1,533
CampusDown ↗
English

Skill-Biased Technological Change

📈 Economics By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Skill-biased technological change (SBTC) is the hypothesis that technologies such as computers raise the productivity of highly skilled workers more than the less skilled, increasing skill demand and wage inequality. It is a leading explanation for rising inequality since the 1980s.
Contents
  1. 1. Core claim
  2. 2. Education and technology
  3. 3. Critiques
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Core claim

Katz and Murphy (1992) argued the college premium rose despite more graduates because skill demand grew faster. Berman and colleagues (1994) traced this to within-industry technical change, and Autor and colleagues (1998) linked it to computerisation.

Education and technology

Goldin and Katz (2008) framed inequality as a race between education and technology, linking to human capital theory. Acemoglu (2002) argued abundant skills direct technology to be skill-biased.

Critiques

Card and DiNardo (2002) noted inequality stalled while computers spread. Acemoglu and Autor (2011) proposed a task-based model explaining job polarisation.

FAQ

What is SBTC in simple terms?
New technology favours highly educated workers, widening pay gaps.
How does it relate to job polarisation?
Polarisation refines SBTC: technology replaces routine tasks, hollowing out middle jobs.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 35–78. Classic supply-demand account.
  2. Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994). Changes in the demand for skilled labor within U.S. manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufactures. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 367–397. Within-industry skill upgrading.
  3. Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998). Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1169–1213. Computers and skill demand.
  4. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 7–72. Theory of directed technical change.
  5. Card, D., & DiNardo, J. E. (2002). Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: Some problems and puzzles. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), 733–783. A leading critique.
  6. Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2008). The race between education and technology. Harvard University Press. Education versus technology over a century.
  7. Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4B, pp. 1043–1171). Elsevier. The task-based extension.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '숙련편향적 기술변화' on CampusDown →

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.