Main theories
- Social conscience: welfare grows gradually as altruism and humanitarianism accumulate; criticised as naive about conflict and power.
- Industrialism (convergence): Wilensky and Lebeaux (1958) argued industrialisation creates needs, such as weakened family support, that welfare meets, so industrial states converge.
- Monopoly capital: a neo-Marxist view of welfare as serving accumulation and legitimation (O'Connor).
- Social democracy (power resources): strong unions and left parties produce generous welfare (Korpi, Esping-Andersen).
- Interest group pluralism: welfare expands through competition among groups such as older people.
- State-centred: bureaucracies and political institutions shape policy (Skocpol).
- Diffusion: programmes spread by imitation across countries (Collier and Messick).
Summary
No single theory fits every country. Korea's welfare growth is often explained by industrialisation, post-democratisation civil society pressure, bureaucratic leadership and policy diffusion after the 1997 crisis.
References
- Wilensky, H. L., & Lebeaux, C. N. (1958). Industrial Society and Social Welfare. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Korpi, W. (1983). The Democratic Class Struggle. Routledge.
- Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press.
- Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Harvard University Press.