Background
Harvard physiologist Walter Cannon, known for the fight-or-flight response, criticised the James-Lange theory in 1927 and, with his student Philip Bard's animal studies, offered an alternative.
Five objections to James-Lange
- Separating the viscera from the brain does not abolish emotional behaviour.
- Visceral changes are similar across emotions and non-emotional states.
- The viscera are relatively insensitive.
- Visceral changes are too slow to be the source of feeling.
- Inducing visceral changes with drugs does not produce real emotion.
Claim and limits
Sensory input reaches the thalamus, which simultaneously signals the cortex (felt emotion) and the autonomic system and muscles (bodily response). Later work showed the hypothalamus, amygdala and limbic system matter more than the thalamus, and that bodily feedback does shape emotion, so the theory has been revised.
References
- Cannon, W. B. (1927). The James-Lange theory of emotions: A critical examination and an alternative theory. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 106-124.
- Bard, P. (1928). A diencephalic mechanism for the expression of rage with special reference to the sympathetic nervous system. American Journal of Physiology, 84, 490-515.
- Dror, O. E. (2014). The Cannon-Bard thalamic theory of emotions: A brief genealogy and reappraisal. Emotion Review, 6(1), 13-20.