What is motivation crowding in simple terms?

Attaching money or fines to something people do willingly can erase the willingness and make them do less of it.

Why did fines increase lateness?

The fine turned a moral obligation into a price that parents could simply pay.

Motivation Crowding Theory

📈 Economics By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated October 27, 2026 Views 1

Motivation crowding theory holds that external incentives such as money, rewards or fines can crowd out people's intrinsic motivation or sense of moral duty, or sometimes crowd it in, changing behaviour in unexpected ways. Economist Bruno Frey theorised it, challenging the standard assumption that bigger incentives always mean more of the desired behaviour.

Contents

1. Titmuss and the theory's origins
2. Classic cases
3. Policy implications and critiques
4. FAQ
5. References

Titmuss and the theory's origins

Comparing Britain's voluntary blood donation with America's paid market, Titmuss (1970) argued that paying donors can weaken altruism and reduce the quantity and quality of blood. Frey (1997) and Frey and Jegen (2001) developed this into economic theory: interventions perceived as controlling crowd out intrinsic motivation, while those perceived as supportive crowd it in, in line with self-determination theory.

Classic cases

Frey and Oberholzer-Gee (1997) found that offering compensation nearly halved Swiss residents' acceptance of a nuclear waste site. Gneezy and Rustichini (2000) showed that fining parents for late pickup at Israeli day-care centres increased lateness, because the fine turned guilt into a price. Deci et al. (1999) confirmed in a meta-analysis that contingent rewards undermine intrinsic motivation, and Mellström and Johannesson (2008) found that payment reduced blood donation among women.

Policy implications and critiques

Bowles and Polanía-Reyes (2012) show that incentives and social preferences can be substitutes or complements, so rewards and penalties need careful design where civic motives matter, as with public goods, volunteering and environmental behaviour. The theory has shaped behavioural economics and nudge debates. Its limit is that effect sizes and conditions vary, making crowding-out hard to predict.

FAQ

What is motivation crowding in simple terms?: Attaching money or fines to something people do willingly can erase the willingness and make them do less of it.
Why did fines increase lateness?: The fine turned a moral obligation into a price that parents could simply pay.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

Titmuss, R. M. (1970). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. Allen & Unwin. The classic arguing that paying for blood can crowd out donation.
Frey, B. S. (1997). Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Edward Elgar. Frey's book-length economic theory of motivation crowding.
Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. American Economic Review, 87(4), 746–755. Swiss evidence that compensation reduced acceptance of a nuclear waste site.
Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611. A survey of the theory's conditions and evidence.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. Meta-analysis showing extrinsic rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation.
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17. Day-care fines for late pickup increased lateness.
Bowles, S., & Polanía-Reyes, S. (2012). Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements? Journal of Economic Literature, 50(2), 368–425. Reviews when incentives and social preferences substitute or complement.
Mellström, C., & Johannesson, M. (2008). Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4), 845–863. A field experiment testing Titmuss's claim.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '동기구축효과' on CampusDown →

Self-Determination TheoryDeci and Ryan's self-determination theory: the three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness), the continuum from amotivation to intrinsic motivation, six mini-theories, applications and criticisms.🧠 Psychology Behavioral EconomicsBehavioral economics explained: how it differs from standard economics, Simon's bounded rationality, Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory and loss aversion, Thaler's mental accounting, present bias, nudges like auto-enrollment, and its critics.📈 Economics NudgeWhat is a nudge? Thaler and Sunstein’s choice architecture, how default settings boosted 401(k) enrollment and organ-donor consent, examples from public policy, the difference between nudges, sludge and dark patterns, and key criticisms.📈 Economics Public goodWhat a public good is in economics, non-rivalry and non-excludability, examples, the free-rider problem and market failure, the four types of goods, and the tragedy of the commons.📈 Economics

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 27, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.