CampusDownWiki CampusDown ↗
English

Organizational Change and Resistance Management

🏛️ Politics & Public Administration By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Quick answer: theories of organizational change and resistance explain how organizations change their goals, structures, technology and culture, why members resist, and how to overcome that resistance. Kurt Lewin's three-step model and John Kotter's eight-step model are the best known; public administration treats the topic under administrative change.
Contents
  1. 1. Lewin's three-step model
  2. 2. Kotter's eight steps
  3. 3. Four views of organizational change
  4. 4. Causes of resistance and responses
  5. 5. References

Lewin's three-step model

Lewin (1947) saw change as a force field in which driving and restraining forces are in balance, and proposed three steps.

  • Unfreezing: creating a felt need to move away from the status quo
  • Moving: introducing new behaviour, structures or values
  • Refreezing: stabilising the new state in rules and habits

Kotter's eight steps

Kotter (1996) set out a sequence: (1) establish a sense of urgency, (2) create a guiding coalition, (3) develop a vision and strategy, (4) communicate the vision, (5) remove obstacles and empower action, (6) generate short-term wins, (7) consolidate gains and produce more change, (8) anchor the change in the culture.

Four views of organizational change

Van de Ven and Poole (1995) grouped theories of change into four types: life-cycle (growth through set stages), teleological (purposeful adaptation towards goals), dialectical (conflict and synthesis of opposing forces) and evolutionary (variation, selection and retention).

Causes of resistance and responses

Kotter and Schlesinger (1979) named four causes of resistance: parochial self-interest, misunderstanding and lack of trust, different assessments of the change, and low tolerance for change. They advised choosing among these strategies according to the situation.

  • Education and communication
  • Participation and involvement (Coch & French's 1948 factory study is a classic demonstration of participation's effect)
  • Facilitation and support (retraining, counselling)
  • Negotiation and agreement
  • Manipulation and co-optation
  • Explicit and implicit coercion

The earlier strategies take time but leave less resistance; the later ones are fast but risk backlash. For an organization designed to keep changing see learning organization, and for public-sector reform see New Public Management.

References

  1. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.
  2. Coch, L., & French, J. R. P., Jr. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1(4), 512–532.
  3. Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1979). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 106–114.
  4. Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.
  5. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '조직변동과 저항 관리' on CampusDown →

You may also like

This article was last updated on October 15, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.