CampusDownWiki
Total citations 10,568한국어KO 2,688EnglishEN 5,641日本語JA 748中文ZH 1,491
CampusDown ↗
English

Six Degrees of Separation

👥 Sociology By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Six degrees of separation is the idea that any two people on Earth are connected by a chain of about six acquaintances on average, a signature example of the small-world property of social networks.
Contents
  1. 1. Origins and Milgram's small-world experiment
  2. 2. What network science explains
  3. 3. Large-scale tests and critiques
  4. 4. FAQ
  5. 5. References

Origins and Milgram's small-world experiment

The idea first appeared in the Hungarian writer Frigyes Karinthy's short story "Chains" (1929). Ithiel de Sola Pool and Manfred Kochen began modeling acquaintance networks mathematically in the 1950s (published 1978), and the psychologist Stanley Milgram made the idea famous with his 1967 experiment. Milgram asked residents of Nebraska and Kansas to get a letter to a specific person in Boston, passing it only to an acquaintance they thought more likely to know the target. In Travers and Milgram's (1969) report, letters that arrived passed through about 5.2 intermediaries on average, which gave rise to the phrase "six degrees." The phrase itself was popularized by John Guare's play Six Degrees of Separation (1990) and the "Kevin Bacon game."

What network science explains

Watts and Strogatz (1998) showed that adding just a few random links to a regular, highly clustered network sharply shortens average path length while preserving high clustering, the "small-world network" model. Granovetter's weak ties play exactly this shortcut role. Jon Kleinberg (2000) showed that for people to find short paths using only local information, without a global map, long-range links must be distributed with distance in a particular proportion: the condition of navigability. Barabási and Albert's (1999) scale-free model explains how highly connected hubs shorten paths further, a cumulative-advantage process resembling the Matthew effect.

Large-scale tests and critiques

In an email experiment with more than 60,000 participants in 13 countries, Dodds, Muhamad and Watts (2003) found successful chains were about five to seven steps long, though most chains broke off. Leskovec and Horvitz (2008) measured an average distance of 6.6 in a Microsoft Messenger network of about 180 million users, and Backstrom et al. (2012) calculated an average distance of about 4.74 (about 3.74 intermediaries) among roughly 700 million active Facebook users. There are critiques. The psychologist Judith Kleinfeld (2002) pointed out that only a minority of letters in Milgram's original study arrived and that the choice of starters was biased. Researchers also stress that the existence of a short path is not the same as people being able to find it, and that distances may differ by class and region.

FAQ

Is everyone really connected by six steps?
There is strong evidence that short paths exist on average, but it does not mean everyone is exactly six steps apart. Some people and groups are isolated, and averages vary with the network measured.
How many degrees are there on Facebook?
Backstrom et al. (2012), using 2011 data, computed an average distance of about 4.74 among active users; a 2016 Facebook analysis cited about 3.5 intermediaries.

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-26

References

  1. Karinthy, F. (1929). Láncszemek [Chains]. In Minden másképpen van. Budapest: Atheneum.
  2. de Sola Pool, I., & Kochen, M. (1978). Contacts and influence. Social Networks, 1(1), 5–51.
  3. Milgram, S. (1967). The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 1(1), 61–67.
  4. Travers, J., & Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32(4), 425–443.
  5. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.
  6. Kleinberg, J. M. (2000). Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406(6798), 845.
  7. Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.
  8. Dodds, P. S., Muhamad, R., & Watts, D. J. (2003). An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science, 301(5634), 827–829.
  9. Kleinfeld, J. S. (2002). The small world problem. Society, 39(2), 61–66.
  10. Leskovec, J., & Horvitz, E. (2008). Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proceedings of WWW 2008 (pp. 915–924).
  11. Backstrom, L., Boldi, P., Rosa, M., Ugander, J., & Vigna, S. (2012). Four degrees of separation. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Web Science Conference (pp. 33–42).
  12. Guare, J. (1990). Six Degrees of Separation. New York: Vintage.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '6단계 분리' on CampusDown →
Strength of Weak TiesWhat the strength of weak ties means, Granovetter's 1973 paper and job-search study, the idea of network bridges, critiques from studies of China and organizations, complex contagion, and the 2022 LinkedIn causal experiment.👥 SociologyStructural HolesWhat structural holes are, Ronald Burt's 1992 theory of brokerage, measures such as constraint and effective size, the debate with Coleman's network closure, the good-ideas research, and cultural and contextual limits.👥 SociologyComplexity TheoryComplexity theory explained: systems of many interacting parts from which hard-to-predict order emerges. Emergence, self-organization, nonlinearity and path dependence, the Santa Fe Institute, Schelling's segregation model, applications in sociology and public administration, and limits.👥 SociologySocial CapitalSocial capital explained: Bourdieu's forms of capital, Coleman's norms and closure, Putnam's civic engagement and Bowling Alone, bonding, bridging and linking capital, Granovetter's weak ties, measurement and critiques.👥 SociologyTipping PointWhat a tipping point is, how Grodzins and Schelling used it to explain residential segregation, Granovetter's threshold model of collective behavior, Gladwell's popularization, climate tipping elements, and experiments on social conventions.👥 SociologyNetwork Effects and Platform EconomicsNetwork effects and platform economics explained: direct and indirect network effects, critical mass and tipping, two-sided market pricing, multi-homing and the platform regulation debate, based on the original papers.📈 Economics

You may also like

Latest ArticlesView all ›

New guides for college study and assignments (Korean)

This article was last updated on October 26, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.