Background
When trait research failed to find consistent results, scholars turned to observable, learnable behavior. In the history of leadership theory it sits between trait theory and contingency theory.
Key studies
- Lewin (1939): autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire styles.
- Ohio State: the LBDQ revealed initiating structure and consideration.
- Michigan: job-centered versus employee-centered leaders, with the latter often linked to higher output and satisfaction.
- Blake and Mouton's Managerial Grid: concern for production versus concern for people on a 9 x 9 grid, with 9,9 team management as the ideal.
Limits
The theories assumed one best style, but effectiveness varied by situation, which led to contingency theories.
References
- Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 269-299.
- Stogdill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (Eds.). (1957). Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement. Ohio State University.
- Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The Managerial Grid. Gulf.
- Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage.