CampusDownWiki CampusDown ↗
English

Human Relations Theory

💼 Business By CampusDown Wiki Editorial Team Last updated
Quick answer: human relations theory holds that productivity depends heavily on social and psychological factors such as peer relationships, attention and group norms, not just pay and working conditions. It grew out of the Hawthorne studies at Western Electric.
Contents
  1. 1. What is human relations theory?
  2. 2. The Hawthorne studies
  3. 3. Core claims
  4. 4. Compared with scientific management
  5. 5. Criticism and legacy
  6. 6. References

What is human relations theory?

Human relations theory emerged in the United States in the 1920s and 1930s. It saw workers not as purely economic actors but as social beings who seek belonging and recognition, as a corrective to Taylor's scientific management with its focus on standardized tasks and piece rates.

The Hawthorne studies

  1. Illumination experiments (1924-27): output rose whether lighting was increased or decreased, so physical conditions alone could not explain it.
  2. Relay assembly test room (1927-32): output generally rose across changes in breaks and hours; researchers credited attention and group atmosphere.
  3. Interview program: more than 20,000 employees were interviewed, revealing that feelings and attitudes affect work.
  4. Bank wiring observation room: the work group enforced its own "fair day's output" norm, revealing informal organization.

The findings were reported in Roethlisberger and Dickson's Management and the Worker (1939).

Core claims

  • Workers are social beings; non-economic rewards matter.
  • Informal groups exist within formal organizations, and their norms shape output.
  • Managers need communication, participation and considerate leadership.

Compared with scientific management

Scientific managementHuman relations
View of peopleEconomic manSocial man
FocusFormal structure, work methodsInformal groups, feelings
MotivatorsPiece ratesRecognition, belonging, participation

Criticism and legacy

Carey (1967) and others criticized the studies' design and interpretation, and a reanalysis of the original data (Levitt & List, 2011) found the "Hawthorne effect" weaker than claimed. Still, the movement led to McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y, Herzberg and other motivation theories, behavioral organization science and later systems perspectives.

References

  1. Mayo, E. (1933). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Macmillan.
  2. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the Worker. Harvard University Press.
  3. Carey, A. (1967). The Hawthorne studies: A radical criticism. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 403-416.
  4. Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2011). Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(1), 224-238.
  5. McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill.

Reports and materials that use this theory (Korean)

There are no materials dedicated to this theory yet, but you can search related reports in the CampusDown library (Korean).

Find more reports · Search '인간관계이론' on CampusDown →

You may also like

This article was last updated on October 15, 2026. It is based on widely recognized original works and textbooks; when citing it in a paper, please check the original sources listed in the references.