概念由来
是芝加哥学派之后城市贫困研究的核心。
行为与结构解释
常与贫困文化论比较。
CampusDown PICK大家都在看
污名批评
现多用社会排斥概念。
常见问题
- 简单来说?
- 脱离主流社会的贫困群体。
- 两人区别?
- 默里归咎福利,威尔逊归咎结构。
来源核查日期:2026-10-26
参考文献
- Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy, 1950–1980. Basic Books. 认为福利导致依赖的保守经典。
- Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. University of Chicago Press. 结构性解释的代表作。
- Wilson, W. J. (1991). Studying inner-city social dislocations: The challenge of public agenda research. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 1–14. 讨论术语之争的会长演讲。
- Gans, H. J. (1990). Deconstructing the underclass: The term's dangers as a planning concept. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(3), 271–277. 批评标签危险性的论文。
- Jencks, C., & Peterson, P. E. (Eds.). (1991). The urban underclass. Brookings Institution. 多角度讨论定义与规模的编著。
- Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press. 讨论居住隔离作用的著作。
- Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Polity Press. 比较美国贫民区与法国郊区的著作。
