الاستدلال المدفوع

النظرية

بيّنت كوندا (1990) أن دوافع الاتجاه توجّه استرجاع الأدلة والقواعد.

السياسة

يقبل المتحزبون الحجج الموافقة بسهولة ويشككون في المخالفة.

الجدل

يرى بينيكوك وراند (2019) أن قلة التفكير تفسر تصديق الأخبار الزائفة.

الأسئلة الشائعة

ما المفهوم ببساطة؟

نقرر ما نريد تصديقه ثم نبحث عما يؤيده.

ما الفرق عن الانحياز التأكيدي؟

يركز الأول على الدافع وراء تغيّر معايير التقييم.

تاريخ مراجعة المصادر: 2026-10-26

المراجع

1. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.
3. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
4. Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584.
5. Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 109–126.
6. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
7. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2016). Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 141–164.
8. Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424.
9. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86.
10. Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74.
11. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50.
12. Ditto, P. H., et al. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291.
13. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2016). The mechanics of motivated reasoning. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 133–140.