理念与话语
背景能力与前景话语能力。
协调性与沟通性话语
单一与多元行动者体制不同。
CampusDown PICK大家都在看
扩展与批评
常见问题
- 简单来说是什么？
- 用理念与言说解释制度变迁。
- 与其他制度主义区别？
- 强调理念与话语动态。
来源核查日期：2026-10-26
参考文献
- Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326. 系统化话语制度主义的原典综述，适合了解核心概念。
- Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth 'new institutionalism'. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25. 将话语制度主义定位为第四种新制度主义的论文，适合了解与其他制度主义的比较。
- Schmidt, V. A. (2002). The futures of European capitalism. Oxford University Press. 显示话语左右欧洲各国经济改革的著作，适合了解实证案例。
- Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press. 认为危机中经济理念引领制度变迁的著作，适合了解理念的因果作用。
- Bell, S. (2011). Do we really need a new 'constructivist institutionalism' to explain institutional change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906. 认为历史制度主义已足够的反驳，适合了解对该理论的批评。
- Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. 整理理念权力三种形式的论文，适合了解权力概念扩展。
- Carstensen, M. B. (2011). Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: Bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 147–167. 认为行动者拼装理念的论文，适合了解渐进理念变迁。