起源
与公地悲剧研究相关。
国家与公民协同
CampusDown PICK大家都在看
重新关注与批评
作为新公共管理的替代受到关注。
常见问题
- 简单来说是什么？
- 公民共同创造公共服务。
- 缺点是什么？
- 存在责任转嫁与不平等担忧。
来源核查日期：2026-10-26
参考文献
- Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011. 将消费者视为共同生产者的早期核心论文，适合了解概念起源。
- Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65. 区分个人、团体与集体共同生产的论文，适合了解类型划分。
- Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. 以巴西与尼日利亚案例分析国家与公民协同的论文，适合了解发展语境应用。
- Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519. 比较欧洲托育服务家长参与的论文，适合了解福利服务应用。
- Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. 整理用户与社区共同生产类型的论文，适合了解当代讨论。
- Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. 系统综述共创与共同生产研究，适合了解研究动向。
- Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. 从服务管理视角重新概念化共同生产的论文，适合了解最新理论发展。