概念
财政联邦制中的谜题。
原因
可用心理账户解释。
CampusDown PICK大家都在看
实证与批评
考虑内生性后效应可能消失。
常见问题
- 简单来说?
- 钱落在哪里就粘在哪里。
- 为何叫粘蝇纸?
- 资金粘在最初的预算上。
来源核查日期:2026-10-26
参考文献
- Gramlich, E. M. (1977). Intergovernmental grants: A review of the empirical literature. In W. E. Oates (Ed.), The political economy of fiscal federalism (pp. 219–239). Lexington Books. 梳理早期实证研究的经典综述。
- Courant, P. N., Gramlich, E. M., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1979). The stimulative effects of intergovernmental grants: Or why money sticks where it hits. In P. Mieszkowski & W. H. Oakland (Eds.), Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid (pp. 5–21). Urban Institute. “钱落在哪里就粘在哪里”的出处。
- Filimon, R., Romer, T., & Rosenthal, H. (1982). Asymmetric information and agenda control: The bases of monopoly power in public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 17(1), 51–70. 以官僚信息优势解释的论文。
- Hines, J. R., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217–226. 从行为经济学角度解释的文章。
- Bailey, S. J., & Connolly, S. (1998). The flypaper effect: Identifying areas for further research. Public Choice, 95(3–4), 335–361. 梳理解释与测量问题的综述。
- Knight, B. (2002). Endogenous federal grants and crowd-out of state government spending: Theory and evidence from the federal highway aid program. American Economic Review, 92(1), 71–92. 显示考虑内生性后效应可能消失。
- Inman, R. P. (2008). The flypaper effect (NBER Working Paper No. 14579). National Bureau of Economic Research. 综合理论与实证的综述。
