两种监督
直接检查与投诉。
为何偏好火警
委托代理案例。
程序与局限
规制俘获风险。
常见问题
- 简单来说？
- 主动检查或等待报警。
- 缺点？
- 弱势声音难被听到。
来源核查日期：2026-10-26
参考文献
- McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179. 原始论文。
- Ogul, M. S. (1976). Congress oversees the bureaucracy: Studies in legislative supervision. University of Pittsburgh Press. 早期观点。
- Weingast, B. R., & Moran, M. J. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy, 91(5), 765–800. 国会控制实证。
- McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3(2), 243–277. 程序控制。
- McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Structure and process, politics and policy: Administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review, 75(2), 431–482. 结构与过程。
- Aberbach, J. D. (1990). Keeping a watchful eye: The politics of congressional oversight. Brookings Institution. 监督趋势。
- Epstein, D., & O'Halloran, S. (1999). Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. Cambridge University Press. 授权与控制。